I have recently read this article. And I was shock that.....
"The original submission in digg, posted an hour before its duplicate, received only 21 diggs. The second, made popular by a so-called powerdigger made the front page with 2752 diggs."
That's really odd... Duplicate contents/posts win over the original contents/posts...
Quote:
|
Users have suggested switching to rival site Reddit.com, where submissions are anonymous. Others have proposed an algorithmic penalty system such as the one in use at Flickr that seems to devalue group submissions and add value to unconnected simultaneity. Still others, over 1,100 of them, have signed an iPetition about the situation....
|
Digg.com Suffers Under Regime Change
By Jason Lee Miller