[salimnina]

Hi,
I was contacted by a so called Web design company, their work was rubbish and I had to involve my self at every stage, this company is not going to fulfill the complete project and they are just going to design what their own requirements, not mine... they listed what they will do for us and they expected us to just approve it. I told them in many occasions that this is not only that but there is more to what needs to be done, I gave them a copy of my own requirements in a separate sheet that they agreed.
before paying them I asked them to sign a clause which stipulates that they should design back end and front end system for our company, the clause also stipulates that the design would reflect the business functions over all, not per requirements. it was signed by one of their member who claimed to be the MD for the company.
My question is how does this look in court of law? and what are their chances to argue that they didn't have to design anything but what they will do for us. we will contact our solicitor very soon to sue them and we need to know what we should gather in terms of documentations and supporting evidence
thanks