Quote:
Originally Posted by Atom
The con arguments in the link in post #3 are weak and profuse with attackable statements, whereas the pro arguments seem altogether sound to me. There are so many statements to challenge on the con side that the issue actually seems to me to border on no contest.
|
Nice catch there. Now you see why I qualified my comment with "appears to be" a neutral source. Initially I left that out, but after going back over it, I couldn't decide if they were actually neutral or if they had possibly left out quite a few con arguments.