Thread: Dmoz inclusion
View Single Post
Old 06-23-2009, 04:46 PM   #111 (permalink)
anonymously
v7n Mentor
 
Join Date: 02-14-08
Posts: 235
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Latest Blog:
None

anonymously is a name known to allanonymously is a name known to allanonymously is a name known to allanonymously is a name known to allanonymously is a name known to allanonymously is a name known to allanonymously is a name known to allanonymously is a name known to allanonymously is a name known to allanonymously is a name known to allanonymously is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by ranter View Post
Am I missing something?
Who are you talking about?

Ranter, do you ever read a context, for at least the second time you have taken a little of a post and tried to fry it.

In context, the comment was that DMOZ is successful, if it were not why would people want to discuss how to get in and why they have not been listed? In context I was discussing why we had acid thrown at us, by some individuals, and said that our success gave us some of those problems.

Quote:
why it listed
If you have problems with any site please simply press the update button and make your comment, an editor will then look at it. Obviously your motives for not actually doing that, which is much easier than bringing the issue here, seem not to be to help the directory but to try and discredit it. Perhaps you have your own agenda.
__________________
______________________________________________
My opinions are my own and do not represent DMOZ staff, directory or other editors.
anonymously is online now