View Single Post
Old 06-25-2009, 09:34 PM   #10 (permalink)
kieransimkin
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: 06-25-09
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 113
iTrader: 0 / 0%
kieransimkin is liked by somebodykieransimkin is liked by somebodykieransimkin is liked by somebody
Quote:
Originally Posted by htmlbasictutor View Post
Reference: It’s alt attribute, not alt tag at 456 Berea Street

Relying on images using the alt attribute isn't going to add to the usability, accessibility nor the SEO of the site.
My question is why - under what circumstances is the alt attribute on an image less accessible than a piece of plain text?

You make a good point about the misuse of the term "alt tag" - of course you are correct and if I'd thought about it for a minute I'd have known that myself. The tag is an IMG tag, the alt text is an attribute of that tag. I hadn't even noticed that the incorrect terminology had crept into common usage - normally that's exactly the kind of thing that annoys me, so I can see where you're coming from!
kieransimkin is offline   Reply With Quote