View Single Post
Old 11-02-2004, 12:26 PM   #91 (permalink)
littleFella
Inactive
 
littleFella's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-20-04
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,359
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Latest Blog:
None

littleFella is a splendid one to beholdlittleFella is a splendid one to beholdlittleFella is a splendid one to beholdlittleFella is a splendid one to beholdlittleFella is a splendid one to beholdlittleFella is a splendid one to beholdlittleFella is a splendid one to beholdlittleFella is a splendid one to beholdlittleFella is a splendid one to beholdlittleFella is a splendid one to beholdlittleFella is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnScott
The idea is rediculous.
Apparently some US laws are ridiculous, so you may want to get in touch with your Washington, DC representative. Hopefully there aren't many more of those laws.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnScott
If somebody calls you up and says, if you go to the local preschool and hack of the heads of ten kids, they won't kill one hundred kids, would you do it?
That wasn;t the scenarion of 9/11, was it?

I did mention that decisions of that sort are tough, but they have to be made sometimes - not within the scenario you proposed. Ethic, morality and such are not black and white at all.

When you really think about it, anti errorist/hostage crisis forces are trained to minimize the loss of life. Sometimes there is no loss of life, but it is understood that in tough situation some of the hostages/victims may be killed.


Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnScott
Killing just isn't an option, even if you know that it might mean more people die in the end.
Again, that would be pretty much an anti war statement in general.
littleFella is offline   Reply With Quote