|
you know, i guess those articles would present a good case for the conspiracy theorist or pessimist that would like to believe that the governmnet or some other agency was responsible for the wtc disaster. i have yet to be convinced of what i believe happened.
for some reason, the thought that demolition charges were set off to collapse the towers is a bit far-fetched. plausible to the skeptic, yes, but i'm no skeptic or conspiracy theorist. i find it amazing that these supposed charges would 'only' be placed at the top of the tower and not at the base as most authorized demolitions. or to merely hide the fact that 757s full of fuel hit the towers, which would make them bombs in a sense.
the second article highlighting the idea that the last plane that crashed in pennsylvania was shot down. now, this is more plausible given the fact that government officials and the military were already aware of wtc and the pentagon. no real argument there, but still ...
still, i am getting pretty sick of hearing all of the conspiracy crap and monday morning quarterbacking on these forums that i frequent. it seems as though these guys spend their time trying to pointing out what is wrong with the world and the american government most of the time. do you not have anything better to do with your time? if i get accused of being ignorant than i will happily plead so and live in bliss as ferre likes to accuse ....
|