Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JohnScott
One easy to fake Osama tape, and dozens of his friends claiming the same thing?
November 2001, U.S. forces recovered a videotape from a destroyed house in Jalalabad, Afghanistan which showed Osama bin Laden talking to Khaled al-Harbi. In the tape, Osama seems to admit planning the attacks. Translations from the tape include the following lines:
( http://www.cbc.ca/news/indepth/targe...ranscript.html)
Later Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and Ramzi Binalshibh were captured. Both were known al Qaida members and both admitted participating in the planning of the attacks. They also indicated bin Laden's direct participation. Mohammed was the principal planner of the attack basing it on the failed Operation Bojinka. Binalshibh may have been picked as a hijacker but, after failing to get into the U.S., worked on financing the operation. Among the details they revealed under interrogation was that the original plan had called for more aircraft but that bin Laden had scaled it down and that bin Laden had attempted to advance the timing of the attacks after events in Israel.
As of 2004, several people including Mohammed, Binalshibh and Mohamed al-Kahtani, the 20th hijacker, were being held by the U.S. as enemy combatants; however, the United States had no one on trial for the attacks. In Germany, Mounir El Motassadeq was convicted of over 3000 counts of accessory to murder for helping finance the hijackers but the verdict was put aside and a new trial scheduled. Abdelghani Mzoudi was acquitted in Germany on the same charges. |
First of all, Osama was once admittedly part of the CIA, secondly, al Qaida is also a product of the CIA.
When one remembers that the WTC bombing in 1993 was a direct result of the CIA helping to orchestrate, and then allowing the bombings to take place, how can you EVER trust them again? ...or think they would not do it again?
A common protocol of CIA covert action is to infiltrate an organization's ideas, then work towards helping make a dirty deed happen ...thus furthering an agenda while offering a patsy.
My point is that 911 is the crux of the main issue of the "war" against Iraq ...and the war against our liberties and the U.S. Constitution.
Distinguishing irregularities:
1 - the WTC buildings were obviously destroyed by demolitions; although they may have wanted to, a group of Arabs living in caves in another country (who didn't speak English very well, if at all) could not have infiltrated the WTC buildings' security for weeks, or months (in advance of 911) in order to strategically plant explosives
2 - Osama and his pals could not have caused NORAD (the most sophisticated defense system on the planet) to stand down on 911
3 - approx half of the alleged perpetrators who supposedly flew planes into the World Trade Centers are alive and known to be living in other countries
4 - the so called Boeing aircraft 911 hijackers were the worst in their class and couldn't even pilot a Cessna, much less a complicated airliner with its radar and positioning guidance systems disabled
When you consider how the current administration has used 911 as the premise to wage war at will and destroy our freedoms and rights of privacy, you come to realize how ultimately necessary it is to understand what has been done to this nation and other people by the blatant falsehoods of the U.S. Executive Branch.
# # #