Thread: True or False
View Single Post
Old 12-21-2006, 12:28 PM   #23 (permalink)
Sadu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 12-15-06
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 120
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Sadu is just really niceSadu is just really niceSadu is just really niceSadu is just really niceSadu is just really niceSadu is just really niceSadu is just really niceSadu is just really niceSadu is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Scott View Post
The underlined part is incorrect. Google does NOT parse keywords in domains when they are run together.
OK, I'm listening, and are certainly not wanting to pass on information that is not correct.

I based my conclusion on being able to get brand new word1word2.com domains ranking for their own name very very easily, and the fact the words in the result are bolded. I also find that greenwidgets.com is easier to rank for terms that include "widgets" or "green" than other domains. It's possible this is a product of incoming link text.

On top of that, I'm a believer in doing what seems logical at the user level - not just pandering to whatever Google thinks is cool at any particular time.

I think if search engines didn't exist, most people would agree that a domain without dashes is best. It's easier to say and remember - 2 very important components of a domain. In most cases it's still perfectly readable.
So to hear that Google does not reward "good practice" in this regard is a little surprising. Normally what is good for the user is good for Google - descriptive anchor text, descriptive titles, well formed code etc etc.

By rewarding dashed domains with good rankings, does this encourage britney-mortgage-casino-widgets.com type behaviour?

But if I'm wrong, I'm wrong, and I'll be updating that article accordingly.

Thanks John.
Sadu is offline   Reply With Quote