Thread: True or False
View Single Post
Old 12-21-2006, 12:36 PM   #27 (permalink)
John Scott
Individualist
 
John Scott's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-27-03
Location: Japan, mostly
Posts: 27,029
iTrader: 3 / 100%
John Scott is supreme webmaster materialJohn Scott is supreme webmaster materialJohn Scott is supreme webmaster materialJohn Scott is supreme webmaster materialJohn Scott is supreme webmaster materialJohn Scott is supreme webmaster materialJohn Scott is supreme webmaster materialJohn Scott is supreme webmaster materialJohn Scott is supreme webmaster materialJohn Scott is supreme webmaster materialJohn Scott is supreme webmaster material
Send a message via AIM to John Scott Send a message via Yahoo to John Scott
Quote:
On top of that, I'm a believer in doing what seems logical at the user level - not just pandering to whatever Google thinks is cool at any particular time.

I think if search engines didn't exist, most people would agree that a domain without dashes is best. It's easier to say and remember - 2 very important components of a domain. In most cases it's still perfectly readable.
So to hear that Google does not reward "good practice" in this regard is a little surprising. Normally what is good for the user is good for Google - descriptive anchor text, descriptive titles, well formed code etc etc.

By rewarding dashed domains with good rankings, does this encourage britney-mortgage-casino-widgets.com type behaviour?

But if I'm wrong, I'm wrong, and I'll be updating that article accordingly.
From a pure SE standpoint, dashes are good.

But if you knew my history, you'd know I don't give SEO the driver's seat.

This forum, and this entire site, used to be located at www.internet-marketing-research.net

It is now at www.v7n.com

You see where I'm going with this?

My web hosting division used to be at www.quality-web-hosting.net - now it's at www.v7inc.com

Brand domains are much easier to promote. From a marketing standpoint, brand domains rule.
__________________
Individualism .::. My Facebook - Add Me
John Scott is offline   Reply With Quote