Quote:
Originally Posted by Marketing Guy
People shouldn't consider "spam" as being "buy cheap ****** now" type posts. Not every piece of content you write needs to be submitted to Digg, which I think is a key mistake a lot of people are making............
Social marketing is not like SEO - you can't simply apply the same concept or techniques to each page of your site and expect similar results. You need to choose your points of "attack" more carefully or you get burned with crap like this.
MG
|
Well, I am afraid your point, although good overall, lacks some important information. And you can find this information here, where you can also learn
how to be a dirty digger. A quote from this article is more than relevant for what I mean:
Quote:
|
Ok I’ve been carrying this post around in my head for a while and am I’m finally going to spill it, here are my tips on how to completely screw your competition in a web 2.0 social media world.
|
But, the actual point of the article is:
Quote:
|
I’m sure someone is going to submit this story and as sure as the sun rises in the east it will get buried. Why … plain and simple it doesn’t agree with the “typical” digg users world view. Despite the fact that it’s true and making adjustments based on the information would be a wise choice, sadly it will go largely unnoticed.
|
And by the way, do you consider
Lee Odden's blog spam?
