[casperl]

In my personal view, DMOZ was the first conceptual attempt at a somewhat democratic link building with a kind of "wiki-like" approach.

Because of...

* Poor customer service;
* Biased review process;
* Corrupt editors;
* Careless admins;
* Submission backlog.


...the whole project hasn't grown up gracefully, like it was initially intended to.

For now, it's a bloated, outdated and largely biased link repository that I fail to find relevant, 95% of the time.

Nevertheless, I give an A+ for the founding principles behind DMOZ.

I totally agree!