Thread: My idea
View Single Post
Old 02-03-2004, 12:03 PM   #22 (permalink)
LazyJim
Moderator
 
LazyJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-13-03
Location: UK
Posts: 2,819
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Latest Blog:
None

LazyJim is a name known to allLazyJim is a name known to allLazyJim is a name known to allLazyJim is a name known to allLazyJim is a name known to allLazyJim is a name known to allLazyJim is a name known to allLazyJim is a name known to allLazyJim is a name known to allLazyJim is a name known to allLazyJim is a name known to all
Send a message via MSN to LazyJim
Yup I like the philosophy of being usable for the search engines. However I think that part of SEO more akin to accessibility than usability.

There's a lot more to the human interface with your site that are far from mechanical and some of them affect overall usability. Some of them aslo rely on things like the user being able to see or think, and the browser correctly displaying what you want it to.

A good example of a non-mechanical usability feature is a metaphor. The most common metaphor on web sites is the button. Clicking a hyperlink is like pushing a button, if something on the page looks like a button you expect to be able to push/click it.

Another example is when u have a body of text that talks about a number of images/diagrams on the same page. It is good usability if you label the images for easier reference in the text, and it's even better in the reference in the text is a clickable and takes you straight to the correct image. (And would be bad usability to try and describe which image, like "second from the top" or something).
__________________

-LJ-

My advice is to look at each case individually, with an informed mind and an appropriately balanced and objective viewpoint.

Web Design and Development, Ipswich, UK.
My deviantArt
LazyJim is offline   Reply With Quote