View Single Post
Old 03-18-2007, 08:49 PM   #8 (permalink)
an0n
Inactive
 
Join Date: 05-01-06
Posts: 37
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Latest Blog:
None

an0n is a jewel in the roughan0n is a jewel in the roughan0n is a jewel in the roughan0n is a jewel in the roughan0n is a jewel in the roughan0n is a jewel in the roughan0n is a jewel in the roughan0n is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by ! Ask ! View Post
99% of directories are nothing more than “human scraped” sites, listing exactly the descriptions that are submitted, so they have 99% duplicated content.

I have built a list of directories that have a rewrite policy of descriptions.

Offcourse I have been totally slaughtered at DP, some even went as far as calling me “Nazi” for making such a small list, it’s not my fault the list is small and I am very permissive, if I only accept 100% copyscape tested sites the list would go to 2-3.

If search engines tight the duplicated content filter a loot of pages will go supplemental or even lose cache, people don’t seen to understand this.
So, run your copyscape on what John calls quality listings


http://directory.v7n.com/Top/Shopping/

Contains the following outbound links, with the following PR:

http://www.bizrate.com/ - PR8

http://www.edealsuk.com/ - PR4

http://www.pricegrabber.com/ - PR8

http://wwww.shopping.com/ - PR8

http://www.uksave.net/ - PR5

and see if they have content that has been duplicated, and then ! ask ! yourself (pun intended) what are you trying to say? You are better than John Scott and v7n? Are you now trying to put into question John's quality based decisions and concepts vs your own?
an0n is offline   Reply With Quote