View Single Post
Old 05-02-2007, 04:35 PM   #11 (permalink)
StupidScript
Inactive
 
StupidScript's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-22-06
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 678
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Latest Blog:
None

StupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really nice
Here's a pretty good rant against the study:
Quote:
There are upwards of 300 active compounds in marijuana. This study took the two most abundant (THC and CBD), and looked to see where the brain was affected. Because of anti-drug taboos, these studies are almost always conducted with synthesized THC. And an MRI will give you an image of activity or inactivity, but - as already mentioned - we don't know all the details of activity in certain areas of the brain.
Quote:
I am not trying to slam the study. The media and its fervor, however, can go take a flying f**k at a rolling donut on this one. Reuters has this article titled "Brain scans pinpoint cannabis health risk." But they didn't. The brain scans show activity or inactivity of the brain, and and the implications affect mental health outlook, while "health" implies physical health or brain damage. First sentence: "Brain scans showing how cannabis affects brain function...." Hold it right there. Function is not measured but by behavior.
I particularly enjoyed the image of the MRI scanner ... if THAT doesn't make you a little paranoid, very little will.
StupidScript is offline   Reply With Quote