Quote:
Originally Posted by Zap
Since you're going to play stupid, here, I guess I'll have to spell it out for you.
User ryukenden sends you a PM. (PM stands for "Private Message", in case you've forgotten.)
You chose to post an excerpt from his private message to you in a public thread.
You quoted his private words publicly and identified him publicly in the first post in this thread, all the while referring to banishment and "cockroaches".
In my opinion, that shows poor form and lets people know that the contents of their "private" messages can become public at any time.
You have some serious anger management issues, John.
Knocking my rep down to -24957767 for a little bit of criticism of you?
What? You couldn't make it lower? Is that the limit or something? 
How childish can a person get? Grow up John.
Do you still want to defend the public posting of (supposedly) private information??? |
Again, what private information? I posted PM that contained no private info and no details.
And I did not red rep you because of the criticism, I red rep you because you are a general, all-purpose schmuck.
Why is it that people who thought they were your close friends PM me to tell me what a schmuck you are? Why is that? Maybe you need to think that one over, instead of trying to blame me. Half the stuff they PM me about isn't even done on this forum, so I think it's a stretch to think I'm at fault for you being a schmuck.