View Single Post
Old 05-10-2007, 09:46 AM   #13 (permalink)
StupidScript
Inactive
 
StupidScript's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-22-06
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 678
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Latest Blog:
None

StupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really niceStupidScript is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julie View Post
If you can't see the difference, then I feel sorry for you.
Oh, but I can see the differences:

The Pope was engaging in extortion (your soul is damned if you legislate in favor of choice) and his church will not suffer any consequences as a result.

The pastor of the Episcopalian church was making points (without any extortion) about war and poverty, and his church was (is) the subject of an invasive investigation by the IRS.

There's quite a difference between the two, and I think the consequences should have been reversed (U.S. Catholic church should lose its tax-exempt status, Episcopalian church should be applauded).

Which difference were you referring to?
(And thank you for the pity. Makes me smile ... )
StupidScript is offline   Reply With Quote