Quote:
|
Death is death, no matter how one looks on it.
|
No, it's not.
Quote:
|
John dude, as for Saddams vast resources, you don't mean the WMD's do you?
|
WHO THE **** MENTIONED WMD?
Quote:
|
He had those scary WMD's, and ties with Bin Laden and el quada too, how can people not remember.
|
Again, WHO THE **** MENTIONED WMD's?
Did Saddam need WMD's to invade Kuwait? Did Ted Bundy need WMD's to kill people? Does Robert Mugabe have WMD's? When Japan slaughtered 200,000 Chinese in Nanking, did they use WMDs? Or did they cut them down one by one, mostly by bayonet?
The Liberal obsession with the word "WMD" has to be the most ****ing stupid fetish I've seen in ages.
Quote:
|
Does he have WMD's? No? Then he must be harmless. LOL LOL LOL Yeah, baby, no WMD, you must acquit.
|
Pure genius there guys, pure genius. When the World Trade Centers fell, there were no WMD's, so that must have been a-okay. And when Saddam tortured and killed hundreds of thousands of his own citizens, he had no WMD's, no I don't know what they were whining about. I mean, c'mon, who gives a rat's ass how many people he murders as long as he didn't have WMD's.
You people seriously ought to give the guy a Nobel ****ing peace prize, just for not having WMD's. Stupid ass argument, but what they hey.
Average IQ of somebody who mutters the words "WMD"? Any guesses?
