View Single Post
Old 05-18-2007, 07:10 PM   #46 (permalink)
TopShelfToys
Inactive
 
Join Date: 04-17-07
Posts: 54
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Latest Blog:
None

TopShelfToys is liked by somebodyTopShelfToys is liked by somebodyTopShelfToys is liked by somebody
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3ncryptabl3_lick View Post

lol... You would feel safer from the government? Yah, they're the ones shooting up schools and robbing stores...
Whats that saying about Noah building the arc before the storm or something? I work in a store front, and relatively speaking, I'm more concerned with down the line potential atrocities on a massive scale as opposed to little old me getting injured during a robbery. However, 2 birds with 1 stone I guess. Not going off on a black helicopter tangent, just pointing out that when you have that much power in a few crafty peoples hands it's feasible (look at history) for it to be abused on a mass scale.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3ncryptabl3_lick View Post

It's a combination of gun responsibility, education, saturation and the laws that keep the pupulous in check.
I hear you on this, well put and I completely agree.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3ncryptabl3_lick View Post
.

Sure, having a gun doesn't (right now) necessarily mean the owner is responsibility and educated but with such an act in place, it would mean more people would be.
I'm all for conceal and carry etc, as long as people are educated in the process, exactly what you said. Sure more people would be educated, there would also be more than aren't however. Guess if you're looking at a percentage of people educated to the point they should be, it's all speculation. Maybe it would have a snowball effect of people being educated, but depending on backlash from being forced to own a guy...it may have the opposite effect.
TopShelfToys is offline   Reply With Quote