Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Daminc
PPC campaign by any chance? |
Um, no. This is the SEO forum. If you wish to discuss pay per click, you might want to go back to some incompetent SEO forum like Jill's.
Quote:
|
Why explain your methods in detail?
|
Allows the client to itemise their budget, allows them peace of mind, increases their confidence in the SEO company which can lead to more referals.[/quote]
More bull. Referrals come from getting your clients top rankings, not itemized hours. LOL
Quote:
|
I'm tempted to get annoyed here but I don't know you well enough to judge whether you're egocentric (toned down) or just agumentative. The advantages of viewing a SEO 'specialist' online would be to get clarification on the strategies they use or the amount of respect given to them with the SEO community.
|
More bull. Jill Whalen has a forum. She posts all day and all night. But nobody is saying she's a truely effective SEO. In fact, if you look at the rankings she's gotten for her clients, they are bunk.
Forum participation means squat.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Marketing is in charge of conversions. SEO is in charge of rankings
|
Ah, sematics. In the company I work for we see SEO as part of SEM. If I was to optimise a page for specific keyphrase but didn't get any conversions that may show that I'm optimising for the wrong phrase.
|
Not any more sematics than the difference between a plumber and a cook.
Quote:
Hey Brian 
Links are Queens, Content is King 
|
You want to back that statement up? Or are you just regurgitating crap you read elsewhere?
Shoqw me one highly competitive keyword that has PR0 page in the top ten on Google.
Links are king. This is old news.