View Single Post
Old 06-06-2007, 12:40 AM   #66 (permalink)
G10
Super Moderator
 
G10's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-10-04
Location: UK - Cheshire
Posts: 16,451
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Latest Blog:
None

G10 is supreme webmaster materialG10 is supreme webmaster materialG10 is supreme webmaster materialG10 is supreme webmaster materialG10 is supreme webmaster materialG10 is supreme webmaster materialG10 is supreme webmaster materialG10 is supreme webmaster materialG10 is supreme webmaster materialG10 is supreme webmaster materialG10 is supreme webmaster material
Quote:
Originally Posted by bytech View Post
I'm saying that religion and science, not spirituality and science, are mutually exclusive (Dawkins would agree). Your factual knowledge about Dawkins and his professional status is limited and very biased, definitely not sufficient to make any kind of authoritative assessment of him.
We don't have to as we can leave it to other scientists to make that assumption.

Stephen Hawking himself stated that it is 'impossible' at present to know whether or not it was created or evolved, nobody has the answer but it seems Mr Dawkins does have

Quote:
Stephen Hawking - "So long as the universe had a beginning, we could suppose it had a creator [the cosmological argument]. But if the universe is really completely self- contained, having no boundary or edge, it would have neither beginning nor end: it would simply be. What place, then, for a creator?"
As I said,I am not a religious zealot by any stretch of the imagination, I just dislike people forcing their views on other people by belittling what others believe, even though they have no proof.
__________________

.: I WAS BORN WITH NOTHING...AND I STILL HAVE MOST OF IT LEFT!! :.
G10 is offline   Reply With Quote