|
>>>I did not say the method was dishonest. I said their conclusion was dishonest.
I think you said there article was very dishonest. But whether it is the method or conclusion I think it is a bit much to make a charge of the article being dishonest. You should feel free to say you disagree and that the premise is not valid, but to say it is dishonest is a bit much.
>>>And Bob, you think referring to Aviva's work as "funny" isn't a personal attack?
It appears that Rand as commenting about the large number of inbound links and the ranking ability for the keywords in the home page title and that some thing was not adding up.
So no I won't see that as a personal attack.
|