Quote:
Originally Posted by Cricket
I have read through this entire thread a few times and still can't make heads or tails out of much of it. Just playing the devil's advocate for a moment here, is it possible that Rand wrote this article with the sole purpose of causing a huge controversy, all in the name of linkbait?  |
Yes, of course. However, if the sole purpose was to get people to take notice and create controversy, then it probably would have been a smarter idea to do something based on solid demonstrable evidence though, instead of manufacturing something as flimsy as what he used, imo. Wouldn't you agree?
-Michael