[bobmutch]

sitetutor:
>>>Bob, you are clearly avoiding giving any concrete answers other than trying to dispute other people's statements.

Please provide all these questions in quote form that I am "clearly avoiding giving any concrete answer to". I have done my best to answer all questions besides a side question about why I think doing a quote search shows better how competitive a key phrase than using a allintitle: and allinanchor: search.


>>>Which of course is what has kept you in business all of those years.

That sounds like a person attack to me. I have keep in business by avoiding giving concrete answers? Can't you do any better than attack me to make a point.


>>>The question I have for you is how much longer you are going to support someone like SEOMOZ for the only reason of staying on someone else's bandwagon which of course is about to derail.


I will support any position SEOMOZ holds thats that is correct and it doesn't matter to me how many directory owers will cry about it nor if it will hurt my own 2 directories or hurt my directory submission service. I did the same when most top SEO consultings realized Pagerank had little or not ranking weight even though I was selling newspaper links based on Pagerank. I gave that up even though I was making a ton of money on it and told my clients that they were better off getting permenant links and not targeting high Pagerank.

>>>I would love your posts to state facts (at least 80 percent of them) rather than answering fluff with fluff.

Well in SEO it is mostly opinions so I can't help you there. I guess it is easyer to call a persons position fluff with fluff than to point out where they opinion is incorrect.