Quote:
Originally Posted by DebbieV
...The fact that you use redirects is likely the reason that strongest links mentions that your site doesn't. Yes, I'm aware of the static links, but it appears Strongest Links aren't and Cornbread has suggested that you contact them to clear this up as it might result in more submissions.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rankland
Relax spambread you and debby v could ask a pro seo if i have redirect links, and the answer is no,no,............  , niether one of you checked it , and i dout you would even know how.....this would be like you both are sticking your feet in your mouth, but im use to you doing it . This is funny that you are calling me spamland when your spamming rt. now with bull ---- information that is false. For one im not a redirect link, and 2 i am a pr 4., dude if anyone thinks you got anything important to say on the forum id hate to see their or your site in a couple years. |
Your ignorance is only exceeded by what little arrogance you think you have. As it's easy to see that comprehension is not your strong point, we'll leave well enough alone.
For others - I mentioned in my previous post that I'm aware of the static links on his directory, but I'm also aware of the redirects in use. The 'Visit" link is redirected and probably the reason why Strongest Links mentions that the directory doesn't pass (different from having) PR as they did not see the static links.
Rankland will once again suggest that I go find some tool that says he's not a PR4 - and I'm glad that most of you can understand that having PR is not the point I'm trying to make, but he lacks at comprehension, so will never understand.