Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean@WMS
On the other hand, I somewhat agree with you, though this argument never works either . . . . but it would seem to me that if an establishment wanted to be a "smoking" establishment, and their employees consented ( and signed all kinds of disclaimers and ended up with really expensive health insurance options -- given that employers are often obliged to provide some form of health insurance to their employees ), then why shouldn't that be allowable? Or say, take it the the level of a cooperative business ( so the "employees" are share owners of the business )?
|
That is entirely possible, but that should be up to the restaurant owner, not the government.
The employees could just as easily apply to work in a nonsmoking environment.