View Single Post
Old 04-29-2008, 10:17 AM   #45 (permalink)
ewomack
v7n Mentor
 
ewomack's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Posts: 3,720
iTrader: 0 / 0%
ewomack is a web professional of the highest orderewomack is a web professional of the highest orderewomack is a web professional of the highest orderewomack is a web professional of the highest orderewomack is a web professional of the highest orderewomack is a web professional of the highest orderewomack is a web professional of the highest orderewomack is a web professional of the highest orderewomack is a web professional of the highest orderewomack is a web professional of the highest orderewomack is a web professional of the highest order
Quote:
Originally Posted by thegamerslink View Post
However it has been proven that our industrial practices have not had that much of an immediate impact on global climates.
That's the controversy. Different groups have different things to say about it. Nothing has been proven or disproven, depending on who you ask. What I've seen (and I haven't seen much) is that academic scientists tend to think anthropogenic warming does exist and is significant and non-academic scientists tend to think it doesn't. Notice that I used the words "tend to." Neither side seems to have delivered a knock-out blow to the other, but each thinks they're correct beyond question. The extremes on both sides think the opposing side is trying to destroy the world: one by ignoring global warming and the other by stifling development. We're humans, we like to take sides, so it seems. But propoganda on both sides clouds the issues.
__________________
Ed Womack
Get Milked
ewomack is offline   Reply With Quote