Hmm...I believe that is what one of the articles was saying.....the measurements that the global warming alarmists are basing their entire reasoning behind was a measurement in glaciers actually 2 of them 5 years apart, and the study of the article showed that glacier drastically changed from year to year so basing a study from measurements 5 years a part would not necessarily be correct. Without a long study over a span of years can't say for sure it's entirely incorrect either. But the basis of the global warming alarmists is in the very least flawed.
Quote:
|
Bangladesh’s geographical position and topography have always made it vulnerable to the regional climate, especially storms and flooding.
|
And you can't just look at a limited history of someplace and call it permanent global warming or cooling....by limited time I'm talking 40-100 years. The earth is a lot older than that and there are proven cycles that take a lot longer than that to go through, while we haven't recorded things long enough to know the actual cycles personally the earth itself tells us what to expect and at the same time we know by the axis of the earth and it orbiting habits that these cycles will be occurring regardless of life on the planet.