Quote:
Originally Posted by jim_noble
It's our directory and we define its standards. There are plenty of directories that don't mind KW stuffed promotional entries but we aren't one of them. We just describe useful websites that have, yes, unique content.
|
Our? Hmmm... you mean DMOZ Editors are owners of ODP directory?
Here we go again with unique.
Can you do us all a favor and to define for us your standards of unique. You see, I have problems to find one unique pie in a pot of pies soup because they all look the same to me. Of course, I can grab one of them and declare it unique but, it would be only my personal opinion and not a fact. Please help us to understand you principle criteria for unique site. It may teach us all how to become better content developers and make your life much more pleasant
Quote:
Originally Posted by jim_noble
There are plenty of websites with it out there - but possibly not in your market sector  . I find some most days in the areas that interest me. |
Again, you are talking about your area of interest. What about sites that have no interest to you? They can't be that bad or better yet they might be much more better than sites that you like and deserve more than your cold shoulder. What happened to them?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jim_noble
We're probably on different planets though.
|
You bet we are. We, sites owners somenow stack on this panet Earth and DMOZ Editors are living on the planet "Nowhere to be found"
fastreplies