View Single Post
Old 11-20-2008, 02:45 PM   #10 (permalink)
FocalPoint
Contributing Member
 
FocalPoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-26-08
Posts: 381
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Latest Blog:
None

FocalPoint is a jewel in the roughFocalPoint is a jewel in the roughFocalPoint is a jewel in the roughFocalPoint is a jewel in the roughFocalPoint is a jewel in the roughFocalPoint is a jewel in the roughFocalPoint is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by thegamerslink View Post
Zap, dude, get a real brain would you? I hire someone to start repairing computers, I even raise their pay because they do a good job, I teach them a lot of the things I know. Three years later I catch that same person skimming the till, or stealing information off of customers hard drives or a plethora of other things. Now I'm faced with a dilemma, I like this person, I hired them, spent time with them, trained them, and when needed defended and vouched for them. Do I ignore what they have done, ignore the fact that apparently they have changed or done wrong, or do I get rid of the person because they are dangerous to my business, they are a thief, they are dishonest?

It's not that hard of a choice really. Just because you put someone in a position does not make that person free to do whatever they want to do without fear of retribution. And it's not hypocritical to fix it after it reaches a level and you lose complete influence or control. If the situation becomes not only dangerous for those that are directly under them but for everyone else that is on the planet. So get off the subject, and until you get a security clearance and have access to all of the intel, just not the part that is conveniently leaked by one side or the other, it is probably better not to place such a fixed opinion on something don't you think?
Tell me slink, are you this abusive at home?...or is this your way of being 'funny'? Just wondering....

I wonder, with your Mr tough guy attitude how you don't puke at the mention of Bush's name...

He was the king of overlooking the failures of his cronie appointments and even praising them when they did wrong. btw... far from firing any who leaked the identity of a CIA agent...he actually commuted the sentence of the one who was convicted...

Your analogy of the computer repair guy to Saddam is pretty silly. Of course the obvious difference is that Saddam was not guilty of possession of WMD.. nor did he have the ability to attack us or his neighbors...

Most people who make mistakes and find out later that they were wrong admit it and move on... it's really that simple...
FocalPoint is offline   Reply With Quote