Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdie
BTW - I notice this thread on DMOZ corruption is now 4 pages long and NO ONE has come back to provide any evidence .... don't figure.
|
If you are looking for direct evidence then I doubt anyone will be offering one simply because DMOZ as any corrupt entity is making sure that you cannot obtain evidence by using available sources. So, lets just forget about evidence beyond reasonable doubts mambo-jumbo and stick to what we know.
We know that directory is managed by so called “Editors” who will do anything to make sure none of competitors’ sites will be ever listed to compete in Category next to their own sites. To make sure they can kill some site and get away with murdering their competitors’ sites, they came up with “unique” content scam, which I must admit is ingenious invention.
The way this scam works is very simple. Editor sees relative to his own suggested site that much better than his own and immediately turn on “unique” content flag that sends competitor’s site into the land of oblivion thereafter conducting action which in my book is defined as corruption.
Now, I made my case your majesties members of this forum by using evidence presented to me by defendant DMOZ Directory and available for your scruples examination. You will find thousands of categories with only 5 or 10 sites listed in them among hundreds of better quality sites that were rejected by Editor(s) of that Categories using “unique” content scam.
