View Single Post
Old 12-19-2008, 12:48 PM   #84 (permalink)
ranter
Banned
 
Join Date: 10-08-08
Location: RealityCheckVille
Posts: 550
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Latest Blog:
None

ranter is a splendid one to beholdranter is a splendid one to beholdranter is a splendid one to beholdranter is a splendid one to beholdranter is a splendid one to beholdranter is a splendid one to beholdranter is a splendid one to beholdranter is a splendid one to beholdranter is a splendid one to beholdranter is a splendid one to beholdranter is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdie View Post
Or could it be that the corruption is just a SEO forum urban legend that keeps on getting repeated and gets repeated so many times ..
Yes, it could but without evidence you are making assumption thus attempting to highjack the topic by giving me bullsh*t response.
Where is your SEO fault evidence?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdie View Post
As i have repeatedly asked, provide ONE piece of evidence to support that and that editor will be removed. It just don't figure that no one can come up with the goods.
Are you in process of getting job as circus clown and here in this forum taking training how to look stupid but be funny at the same time?

Read what I said and get it into your head that if any of us could get that proof, DMOZ Editors will be cut in a half. There is no direct proof accept of strong believe that Category that has only 10 links could do better than that and Editors could find at least 100 more sites from pool of millions submitted if they really want to.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdie View Post
Rubbish. You have made no case. How do you know the sites were rejected? How do you know that they are not just still waiting to be reviewed. Come up with the goods to back it up.
You have made no case. How do you know the sites were rejected?

Very good question. I don’t know if it they were or not simply because DMOZ management nothing more than bunch of ignorant morons with very low Internet Community they represent etiquette. It would be so simple to send rejection email and let people know that their sites were rejected and deleted. Such a simple act would stop un-beneficial to DMOZ endless re-submissions, stupid posts telling us about sites submitted two years ago and asking how long it will take to get listed and all sorts of DMOZ sucks posts.

So, as I said, I don’t know if site was rejected or not as I don’t know the answer to: what is the big freaking problem DMOZ have with sending notice of rejection, but what I know, every directory but DMOZ does it and DMOZ should have at least some respect to Internet Community and keep communication channels open.


Last edited by ranter; 12-19-2008 at 12:51 PM..
ranter is offline   Reply With Quote