Quote:
Originally Posted by meshleman3
You can tell by looking at how many years they have had an affiliate business running and if they are an established company. They should have tons of positive feedback in the search engines too. If they have a lot of creatives then they are most likely legit because they wouldn't be spending a lot of their resourses on them if they didn't have affiliates working for them or good products to sell.
|
Not meaning to cause a fuss, but I'm going to disagree with you on two points:
1) Age
Zango has been around in various iterations for YEARS. They seem to get embroiled in a new issue every year, and seem to screw their own affiliates every year. Yet people still fall for it all.
Hell, back in 2006, one of their PPI affiliate programs literally sent people to sites with kiddy porn with it's Yapbrowser!
http://digg.com/security/Warner_Bros...y_Porn_browser
http://www.vitalsecurity.org/2006/04...-andchild.html
2) Positive Feedback in Search Engines
A LOT of splogging goes on around affiliate networks, particularly ones owned by old hand affiliates. John Lemp got a number of "super duper uber affiliates" to blog about how great he ad ClickBooth were when **** hit the fan earlier this year. Some had the balls to actually say they were being paid to blog and didn't use Clickbooth.
However, this in turn got many of their readers to go on about how great Clickbooth was, even if they hadn't tried it.
Now, regardless as CB's quality as a network, they blatantly manipulated SERP results in a backhanded way by hiring people with 'celebrity' to give them the thumbs up.
On the flipside, a lot of creatives is often a good sign.
Also, if they don't have their own inhouse offers, then the legitimacy of the 3rd party offers they do have is a good indicator as well. Brand names and websites you know about, etc.
Inhouse offers, well, you just have to try it and see.