Do you believe Homosexuals Are Not "Born That Way."? - Page 5

krahmaan · 05-01-2009, 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harveyj

Yeaaaah, there was this little party that Germany had at Berkenow and Auschwitz that you may want to look into... loooooooots of gays there.

Again, your astounding ignorance worries me.

Where is your link to back this statement?

It is also astounding that you did not post it here.

**South** · 04-30-2009, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Muddy

I have a question for you. If you take your statement above and trade the word gay for the word black, or Jew or handicapped or Filipino...what kind of statement would it be?

My lord. Now who a person wants to be naked with is equal to their race or handicap status? I'm sure someone confined to a wheelchair because someone else decided to drive drunk would love to know that his life stifling encasement can can be equally swapped out in a sentence with how someone swings their pheromones.

Same with race.

corneo · 04-30-2009, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Muddy

I have a question for you. If you take your statement above and trade the word gay for the word black, or Jew or handicapped or Filipino...what kind of statement would it be?

A honest one.

Atom · 04-30-2009, 03:12 PM

If we were to assume that religion is the cause of nature, that is all the more reason to respect nature's supposed mistakes.

Atom · 04-30-2009, 03:46 PM

I think it's only common sense to view gays as mistakes in nature, to begin with.

**Muddy** · 05-01-2009, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Muddy

I have a question for you. If you take your statement above and trade the word gay for the word black, or Jew or handicapped or Filipino...what kind of statement would it be?

In reference to the post above, I was obviously not trying to compare gays to African Americans et al. Nor was it meant to be antagonistic in any way. I'm rather amazed it was misread actually. It was simply a rhetorical question. The aforementioned statement seemed less than politically correct, shall we say, (sorry Corneo) and my point was that if another minority were substituted, that political incorrectness would be even more glaringly obvious.

Atom · 04-30-2009, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by corneo

(...) Personally, I think it's a fad. Ignore the gay person and they no longer feel special. (If we ignore them, what will they do next for attention?)

A fad for the maybe's maybe, but what of bonafide gays, you know, the real ones? The ones peculiar from an early age and that progress naturally to the obvious category? I thought those were what we were talking about. Mother nature's sex scheme is obviously extremely biased to one side or the other, but if something goes wrong, we can't simply ignore the mistakes, because they are real people.

I think the real mistake occurs when we've lost sight of this. They are not some odd group that have made bad decisions. That just doesn't fly in the realm of common sense.

Atom · 04-30-2009, 02:08 PM

If the existence of these people is simply a moral issue, I will eat my hat.

homebizseo · 05-01-2009, 04:47 AM

Is there really such a thing as homosexuals? Or is that Hollywood fiction?

Atom · 05-01-2009, 04:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by homebizseo

Is there really such a thing as homosexuals? Or is that Hollywood fiction?

Of course there is, I've seen plenty of them, you haven't? Or... just on TV maybe?

Atom · 05-01-2009, 05:07 AM

I've got to get some sleep, been up forever. Good nightchall.

BlackEyes · 05-01-2009, 05:12 AM

Is homosexual is a disease? How people affected by this?

Rankenstein · 05-01-2009, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by South

How is it then that people can change, or make a different choice? As a heterosexual man, I know that I could never go the other way. It's absolutely without any appeal whatsoever. If a relationship with a woman wasn't possible I'd simply be asexual.

I'm with you on that. But I wouldn't be at all surprised if many homosexuals feel the same way about straight sex. In fact, I'm sure of it.

As we all know, the internet is jam-packed with the strangest expressions of sexuality. People get up to all sorts to get their kicks, yes they do. Homosexuality seems a trifling thing to me, compared with some of the stuff that goes on which would make your eyes bug out on stalks.

StrongInTheArm · 05-01-2009, 09:55 AM

I think there is a group of people that are into that, at least they take pictures of each other with their bug eyes out and post them on the net for their friends to admire and get their rocks off. I'm sure of it.

And if there isn't, would anybody like to start a website for me? We could call it, Bug Eyed Porn

Rankenstein · 05-01-2009, 10:14 AM

uh-oh...

Do you believe Homosexuals Are Not "Born That Way."?-eyes.jpg

**Muddy** · 05-01-2009, 10:36 AM

What have you started Strongy?

StrongInTheArm · 05-01-2009, 10:41 AM

^ It is sure to be a winner, I'm thinking about a book already!

ranter · 05-01-2009, 12:22 PM

The question is: should gay people enjoy marriage and, at least to me, the answer is: let them be married.

Lets not forget that marriage is men made occasion which is going back to times when man would put claim on a woman declaring by that to other men: this is my property, don’t touch it. To make that claim official, man would go to Claim authority like Cave (“City Hall”) or to community or religious leader and ask for official announcement.

Marriage was never joyful for woman because declaration of marriage would make her actual slave and as result something that man would rightfully own. Just look around Middle and Far East (one word Taliban) and I am sure you will give me credit for at least this point.

Look ahead, let say 50 years from now and you will hear the same question you are asking today: what they were thinking about 50 years ago when they persecuted Black on White marriages.

**South** · 05-01-2009, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ranter

The question is: should gay people enjoy marriage and, at least to me, the answer is: let them be married.

Lets not forget that marriage is men made occasion which is going back to times when man would put claim on a woman declaring by that to other men: this is my property, don’t touch it. To make that claim official, man would go to Claim authority like Cave (“City Hall”) or to community or religious leader and ask for official announcement.

Good gravy man, what marriage vows do y'all use there in relalityville? Property? It's two people committing to be only with each other. As for the religious leader. I can't speak for the taliban, but the Christian guidlines of what a man and wife are to one another and what responsibility each has to the other is exactly the opposite of property.

**G10** · 05-01-2009, 08:15 PM

South dude, I would say they should be classed more as magicians than a piece of property as they have this uncanny way of making funds from ones bank balance slowly vanish and then if you divorce them, they go for the big on and pull the rabbit out of the hat and manage to make your house disappear also