Do you believe Homosexuals Are Not "Born That Way."? - Page 7

Atom · 05-02-2009, 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by w3bmaster

I don't have anything with gay peopleas long as they keap it in there home seeing 2 men hand by hand makes me sick ....

That's just peachy, but what has that got to do with the topic question?

homebizseo · 05-02-2009, 03:04 PM

No gays should not be allowed to marry. It is morally wrong.

Atom · 05-02-2009, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by homebizseo

No gays should not be allowed to marry. It is morally wrong.

This doesn't address the topic question. I think you may be confusing this with another thread.

**Cricket** · 05-03-2009, 09:13 AM

Let's get back to the topic at hand folks, which is . . .

Do you believe Homosexuals Are Not "Born That Way."?

homebizseo · 05-03-2009, 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cricket

Let's get back to the topic at hand folks, which is . . .

Do you believe Homosexuals Are Not "Born That Way."?

No, they are not born that way. What do you think Cricket?

**Cricket** · 05-03-2009, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by homebizseo

No, they are not born that way. What do you think Cricket?

As an admin, it is pretty rare for me to get involved in controversial debates, beyond guiding members to keep things respectful and on topic. Now and then, I will also provide some resource links that I feel may add to the discussion. Earlier in this thread, I encouraged members to take a peek at pro/con information concerning this topic on the following site. http://borngay.procon.org/

**Muddy** · 05-03-2009, 01:19 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdH2O...21DFE671637767

**Muddy** · 05-03-2009, 09:32 PM

I believe this video is appropriate to the topic.

krahmaan · 05-03-2009, 10:13 PM

I also don't think people are being mutated by water. That doesn't speak too much in favor of homosexuals. Just gives them another way out of responsibility for their actions. IMHO.

krahmaan · 05-03-2009, 10:20 PM

Thank God for my good old buddy Dan. You the man!

http://www.v7n.com/forums/1027377-post184.html

**Muddy** · 05-03-2009, 10:22 PM

K., please tell me you're joking. Semen up the spine??? To the brain??? I read the article in your link. I don't know what to say. I was particularly astounded to read that the brain and the kidneys are the two most important organs in the human body. In fact, my HEART skipped a beat.

By the way, being gay doesn't automatically mean assuming the role of a woman.

krahmaan · 05-06-2009, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Muddy

K., please tell me you're joking. Semen up the spine??? To the brain??? I read the article in your link. I don't know what to say. I was particularly astounded to read that the brain and the kidneys are the two most important organs in the human body. In fact, my HEART skipped a beat.

I forgot to address this!

Sir Muddy, did you know that Chinese medicine had a great influence on Western medicine? Yes it is true, and I also have a link to back this statement. Have a read. Here's a quote from my source: http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/B...l?show=reviews

Quote:

[A] fascinating account of how China, the Chinese, and Chinese healing practices were imagined in the West from the late Middle Ages through to the mid-nineteenth century. [Barnes] has written a lively and compelling account that demonstrates that Chinese traditional medicine has a lengthy and important role in the development of medical discourse in the West. This work will serve as the starting point for the next generation of scholars.
--Robert John Perrins, Social History of Medicine

ranter · 05-07-2009, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krahmaan

Sir Muddy, did you know that Chinese medicine had a great influence on Western medicine?

Maybe because then there was no an army of pharma companies that nowadays will offer you pill for every possible occasion.

Just a thought.

krahmaan · 05-07-2009, 05:21 PM

You seem to be more closer to the truth than you even know.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zap

And, on the topic of your friend, Dan the man. Perhaps he was more confused than he was gay. Maybe he's bisexual and mariage to a woman was a better option for him than marriage to a man. If he lives in most US states, I'd say that was a certainty.

Here, you say that my friend was possibly more confused than gay. Just a hypothesis on what you just said. Since my friend was possibly more confused, then why could this not apply to all people who think they are gay? As a hypothesis, couldn't they all be a bit confused? Since you just stated that my friend possibly was. Then you went on to say that he chose a woman as a better consequence to his sexual preferences, for his own life and his future. Now why couldn't this same option not apply to all homosexuals? As better choices with better consequences for their very own lives and futures?

As I said before, it seems that you may be on to something here. You've state a truth about homosexuality better than I could have -IMO. And I bet you didn't even know that you did this so well. As it is with TRUTH.

BTW, I think I stated this in another thread on a similar topic but I haven't had any sexual relations for about two years now. For Spiritual purposes of course, but I do plan to marry one day. If I'm blessed with a loving woman, and if I live to see that day come -I may not be, for I do not claim to see the future.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ranter

Maybe because then there was no an army of pharma companies that nowadays will offer you pill for every possible occasion.

Just a thought.

This is why I prefer more natural techniques and remedies to well being. Many pills prescribed by some doctors are just placebo. The FDA is one of the biggest businesses -IMHO.

kudos.

**Zap** · 05-10-2009, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krahmaan

Here, you say that my friend was possibly more confused than gay. Just a hypothesis on what you just said. Since my friend was possibly more confused, then why could this not apply to all people who think they are gay?

Because homosexuality and bisexuality are different.
The information applies to your friend because he is clearly bisexual, not homosexual.

Quote:

Originally Posted by krahmaan

As a hypothesis, couldn't they all be a bit confused? Since you just stated that my friend possibly was. Then you went on to say that he chose a woman as a better consequence to his sexual preferences, for his own life and his future. Now why couldn't this same option not apply to all homosexuals?

Because...
1. Your friend is bisexual, not homosexual.
2. Not all homosexuals (nor bisexuals, nor heterosexuals for that matter) are alike.

Quote:

Originally Posted by krahmaan

You've state a truth about homosexuality better than I could have -IMO. And I bet you didn't even know that you did this so well. As it is with TRUTH.

I stated what I thought about Dan the man and his sexual orientation.
In his particular case, I believe he was confused about his own sexuality.
He focused too much on the fact that he likes sex with members of the same sex, while ignoring the fact that he also enjoys sex with members of the opposite sex, thereby referring to himself as gay in error.