Webmaster Forum

Go Back   Webmaster Forum > The Webmaster Forums > Forum Lobby > Controversial Social Issues

Controversial Social Issues Discussions concerning controversial social issues. Topics include politics, religion, culture, social and economic issues, etc. Respect required at all times.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Share |
  #1  
Old 03-22-2012, 01:44 PM
Cricket's Avatar
Cricket Cricket is offline
No Longer Active
 
Join Date: 10-13-03
Location: Texas
Posts: 42,181
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Thumbs down Gun Sales Explode



If you have been watching the news at all, you may have read reports that gun sales are exploding. Many believe this is because of the upcoming election as people begin to worry that second amendment rights will be curtailed.

My question: Do you believe an administration truly has the power to take away gun rights?

Quote:
In 2008 and 2010, the Supreme Court issued two Second Amendment decisions. In District of Columbia v. Heller ( 2008 ), the Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm, unconnected to service in a militia[1][2] and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. In dicta, the Court listed many longstanding prohibitions and restrictions on firearms possession as being consistent with the Second Amendment.[3] In McDonald v. Chicago (2010), the Court ruled that the Second Amendment limits state and local governments to the same extent that it limits the federal government.[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_...s_Constitution

Quote:
“Sales usually increase this time of year with tax returns, but this year has been higher than most,” Mike Weeks, owner of Georgia Gun Store in Gainesville told FoxNews.com. “People are scared their gun rights are going to be curtailed after the election."http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/03/22...election-year/
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	amo.jpg
Views:	1540
Size:	25.7 KB
ID:	16071  
 
Reply With Quote

Advertisement

Advertisement

  #2  
Old 03-22-2012, 01:57 PM
deohaivan's Avatar
deohaivan deohaivan is offline
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: 03-18-12
Posts: 108
iTrader: 0 / 0%
nonetheless i strongly support the ban
just look at the past few years
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-22-2012, 01:59 PM
dWhite dWhite is offline
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: 09-28-08
Posts: 4,338
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by deohaivan View Post
nonetheless i strongly support the ban
just look at the past few years
"It you outlaw guns, only the outlaws will have guns."
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-22-2012, 02:03 PM
Bob Barr's Avatar
Bob Barr Bob Barr is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: 05-17-08
Location: San Juan Bautista, California
Posts: 3,186
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by dWhite View Post
"It you outlaw guns, only the outlaws will have guns."
Actually, only outlaws and the government will have guns. What could possibly go wrong with that?
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-22-2012, 03:18 PM
Inspired Ink's Avatar
Inspired Ink Inspired Ink is offline
v7n Mentor
 
Join Date: 12-03-11
Location: East Texas
Posts: 710
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Barr View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by dWhite
"It you outlaw guns, only the outlaws will have guns."


Actually, only outlaws and the government will have guns. What could possibly go wrong with that?
Agreed.

As to the question, does the administration have the power to take away rights ...

Well, do they rightfully have that power? No, it's a constitutional amendment. A presidential administration can't just come along and re-write the constitution to suit themselves.

Now ... does the current (or any) administration HAVE that power? When I look around, seems to me that they are already exercising power they don't have in many arenas. If things are carried out, then I guess they DO have the power. Not rightfully of course. It was stolen.

Just as I <ahem> personally believe the office was stolen.
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-22-2012, 03:46 PM
Lauren at LucasWorks Lauren at LucasWorks is offline
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: 08-14-11
Posts: 74
iTrader: 0 / 0%
"Do you believe an administration truly has the power to take away gun rights?"

THIS administration seems to think they have the power to do whatever they damn well please. If they don't think Congress will play along, they simply throw in another Czar, and write up another Executive Order.

However, I'm absolutely opposed to gun bans. If they worked, Chicago would have been safe from 1988 to 2010 (and Washington D.C. would have been safe from 1976 to 2008!) Just read the violent crime stats of these two hell holes during those time frames!

Where I live now, just about every house has at least one firearm. And violent crime is non-existent (Castle Doctrine is alive and well here, and I believe the 'he had it coming' defense is still valid, too...;o)
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-22-2012, 03:51 PM
Inspired Ink's Avatar
Inspired Ink Inspired Ink is offline
v7n Mentor
 
Join Date: 12-03-11
Location: East Texas
Posts: 710
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lauren at LucasWorks View Post
I believe the 'he had it coming' defense is still valid, too...;o)

Is that the same as the "he just needed killing" law?

Around these parts, you'd be pretty foolish to break into anyone's house. Like you said, most everyone has a gun, and I think most people realize that.

If the dogs don't git you, the owner will!
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-22-2012, 03:56 PM
Cricket's Avatar
Cricket Cricket is offline
No Longer Active
 
Join Date: 10-13-03
Location: Texas
Posts: 42,181
iTrader: 0 / 0%
I saw this on FB and laughed so hard I was spitting coffee again!

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	bear.jpg
Views:	2689
Size:	45.3 KB
ID:	16072  
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-22-2012, 04:30 PM
ScriptMan's Avatar
ScriptMan ScriptMan is online now
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: 02-10-07
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 13,270
iTrader: 4 / 100%
I'm not sure. The Constitution and due process hasn't seemed to slow this administration down very much at all. Who knows what evils might lurk in a second term!
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-22-2012, 04:56 PM
Cricket's Avatar
Cricket Cricket is offline
No Longer Active
 
Join Date: 10-13-03
Location: Texas
Posts: 42,181
iTrader: 0 / 0%
I once heard that if you wanted to learn to lift an elephant, you would need to start lifting him the day he was born and continuing lifting him every day...

I am guessing that Hitler did not gain control overnight, but rather by gently slipping away rights one by one and before long, he was able to lift the whole dang adult elephant.

If we do not stand up and speak out when we see our rights being trampled, one day we will wake up and it may be too late.

Just my 2 cents and I probably owe you change.
 
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-22-2012, 05:07 PM
Lauren at LucasWorks Lauren at LucasWorks is offline
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: 08-14-11
Posts: 74
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Funny that you should bring up Hitler. I just thought of the Hitler Youth movement today, as I read this article about a Northern Virginia middle school's civics project.
 
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-22-2012, 05:15 PM
ScriptMan's Avatar
ScriptMan ScriptMan is online now
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: 02-10-07
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 13,270
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cricket View Post
I once heard that if you wanted to learn to lift an elephant, you would need to start lifting him the day he was born and continuing lifting him every day...

I am guessing that Hitler did not gain control overnight, but rather by gently slipping away rights one by one and before long, he was able to lift the whole dang adult elephant.

If we do not stand up and speak out when we see our rights being trampled, one day we will wake up and it may be too late.

Just my 2 cents and I probably owe you change.
And to do that we must defend the rights of of the scumbags first because they are the first targets. Well lately we have this thing called security to abridge rights with.

The Constitution, due process and the rule of law must be followed at all times to stop the trampling of the citizen's rights. Please note I qualified that statement with the word citizen. If you aren't you don't have any other than human decency.
 
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-22-2012, 05:44 PM
robjones's Avatar
robjones robjones is offline
v7n Mentor
 
Join Date: 09-15-09
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,680
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by deohaivan View Post
nonetheless i strongly support the ban
just look at the past few years
That displays an absolute lack of consideration of relevant statistics.

Over the last decade, concealed carry has increased in most states and the "assault weapons" ban expired. Prophets of doom predicted "the return of the wild wild west". Dr John Lott published an analysis on the topic about a week or two back. Not only have statistics have gotten better, a larger number of crimes have been foiled when armed citizens produced a weapon but did not have to fire a shot. [Guns make a very convincing visual aid... trust me, I've done it.]

In the same vein, the long gun registry in Canada has been studied and found wanting. The one set of stats that was claimed to support it being helpful turned out to be that suicides by gun dropped.

What that study failed to mention was that suicides overall remained constant, meaning suicide by other means rose. If the guy kills himself, he's dead regardless, so the bottom line is the gun registry didnt ae any affect on the one bright area in the study.

While I realize your answer was but one of a series of a dozen or so consecutive posts at 60 second intervals and couldnt have much thought process involved... if you make a statement telling us "look at the past few years" ... I'd hope that would lead to stats that back your case, not stats that prove otherwise.

[Hint: Quit speed posting for count. It draws attention you dont want]
 
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-23-2012, 12:35 PM
Bernard's Avatar
Bernard Bernard is online now
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: 02-20-04
Location: Friendswood, TX
Posts: 620
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Quote:
March 21, 2012

Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (NYSE: RGR), announced today that for the first quarter 2012, the Company has received orders for more than one million units. Therefore, the Company has temporarily suspended the acceptance of new orders.

Chief Executive Officer Michael O. Fifer made the following comments:
  • The Company's Retailer Programs that were offered from January 1, 2012 through February 29, 2012 were very successful and generated significant orders from retailers to independent wholesale distributors for Ruger firearms.
  • Year-to-date, the independent wholesale distributors placed orders with the Company for more than one million Ruger firearms.
  • Despite the Company's continuing successful efforts to increase production rates, the incoming order rate exceeds our capacity to rapidly fulfill these orders. Consequently, the Company has temporarily suspended the acceptance of new orders.
  • The Company expects to resume the normal acceptance of orders by the end of May 2012.
The Company will announce its results and file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2012 on Tuesday, May 1, 2012, after the close of the stock market.
http://www.ruger.com/corporate/news/2012-03-21.html

Ruger is so swamped they aren't taking new orders until June!

Re: question posed in OP - all they have to do is declare a national emergency and they can do whatever the heck they want under the auspices of their national emergency powers unless long standing Presidential executive orders are struck down by the SCOTUS (fat chance IMO).

I think there is still sufficient political dissent for Congress to seriously abridge the 2nd amendment with legislation.
 
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-23-2012, 08:42 PM
Breeze Wood's Avatar
Breeze Wood Breeze Wood is offline
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: 04-06-11
Location: USA
Posts: 958
iTrader: 0 / 0%



I'm perfectly happy with my pump 22lr rifle in the rear tool box in the back of the truck (cargo van).

Pistols should be banned.

The above ammunition has no place in a meritorious society.
 
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-23-2012, 10:48 PM
Jim Gillum's Avatar
Jim Gillum Jim Gillum is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: 11-17-09
Location: Deland, Florida
Posts: 7,263
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Our government has a way of developing new laws or regulations that tend to slowly erode our rights......
Look at health care.......because I am old...they might decide not to pay to fix me if I break......I payed all these years......
Why should they care if I have guns?.....

Don't trust them......I don't...
 
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-23-2012, 11:26 PM
Bob Barr's Avatar
Bob Barr Bob Barr is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: 05-17-08
Location: San Juan Bautista, California
Posts: 3,186
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Gillum View Post
Why should they care if I have guns?.....

Don't trust them......I don't...
They care about you having guns because they trust you less than you trust them.
 
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-24-2012, 12:24 AM
Inspired Ink's Avatar
Inspired Ink Inspired Ink is offline
v7n Mentor
 
Join Date: 12-03-11
Location: East Texas
Posts: 710
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Breeze Wood View Post



I'm perfectly happy with my pump 22lr rifle in the rear tool box in the back of the truck (cargo van).

Pistols should be banned.

The above ammunition has no place in a meritorious society.
No offense, but just because you have a certain piece for a certain use, doesn't mean that anyone's firearms outside of that should be banned.

I can't carry a rifle everywhere I go, especially when I'm doing chores. A pistol is much easier to strap on. If there's a coyote coming up on my livestock (and I've had it happen more than once), he's not going to wait while I go back to the house for my rifle.

The fact that I own (and use) a pistol doesn't mean I'm going to go around robbing folks or anything. In my case it DOES have a place.

Besides, concealed carry laws tend to cut down on crime. But that's a whole 'nother point.
 
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-24-2012, 09:00 AM
robjones's Avatar
robjones robjones is offline
v7n Mentor
 
Join Date: 09-15-09
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,680
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Breeze Wood View Post



I'm perfectly happy with my pump 22lr rifle in the rear tool box in the back of the truck (cargo van).

Pistols should be banned.

The above ammunition has no place in a meritorious society.
Do you even know what round that is or does it just look scary?
 
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-24-2012, 11:32 AM
Jim Gillum's Avatar
Jim Gillum Jim Gillum is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: 11-17-09
Location: Deland, Florida
Posts: 7,263
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Barr View Post
They care about you having guns because they trust you less than you trust them.

I can pass a psych test......
wonder if they can.......
 
Reply With Quote
Go Back   Webmaster Forum > The Webmaster Forums > Forum Lobby > Controversial Social Issues

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My head is ready to explode with so much info! mikaela SEO Forum 17 02-20-2011 08:00 PM
explode lajkonik86 Coding Forum 3 08-18-2004 08:08 AM


V7N Network
Get exposure! V7N I Love Photography V7N SEO Blog V7N Directory


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:20 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000-2014 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Copyright © 2003 - 2018 VIX-WomensForum LLC