Webmaster Forum

Go Back   Webmaster Forum > The Webmaster Forums > Forum Lobby > Controversial Social Issues

Controversial Social Issues Discussions concerning controversial social issues. Topics include politics, religion, culture, social and economic issues, etc. Respect required at all times.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Share |
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2012, 12:11 AM
Weebitty's Avatar
v7n Mentor
Latest Blog:
None

 
Join Date: 09-18-10
Posts: 1,010
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Question More Government Or Less?

This article is from Natural News and it raises some interesting points. I agree with most of what he says. I have felt that way for years. If someone wants to do drugs as long as it doesn't hurt someone else (but we know that doesn't happen) either it raises crimes or hurts their kids because they are mistreating them. There in lies the problems. As he expresses repeatedly and is key. AS LONG AS IT DOESN'T HURT SOMEONE ELSE.

The philosophy of freedom: Much more than demanding government get out of our lives, you must first get the tyranny out of your own heart

Quote:
Do you agree with this statement? Government has no business telling us what to drink, what to eat, what kind of medicine we should take, what to smoke, what to farm, or how to run our private lives.

These are all elements of individual liberty or what you might call personal freedom. They are all part of the bigger push to get Big Government off our backs and out of our lives. But do the people who call for individual liberty really believe in it themselves? Or are they carrying around a sharp contradiction in their own beliefs?

Consider the following statements:
Continued at: http://www.naturalnews.com/035478_fr...hilosophy.html

Last edited by snakeair; 04-14-2012 at 05:01 AM.
 
Reply With Quote

Advertisement

Advertisement

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2012, 06:30 AM
Zap's Avatar
Zap Zap is offline
Super Moderator
Latest Blog:
None

 
Join Date: 01-15-06
Posts: 13,754
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Just because something has the potential to cause harm, it does not necessarily follow that it WILL cause harm and should not be treated as such.
When a crime is committed, prosecute the crime, but don't villify an act that may or may not have lead to it.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2012, 09:24 AM
Contributing Member
Latest Blog:
None

 
Join Date: 01-06-12
Location: Jackson Mo
Posts: 250
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Really this is not over big government but over where one persons rights starts and another ends, about respect for your neighbors and government sponsorship of behaviors.

If you want to "urinate on [your] fig plants", you need to do so in a manner that shows respect for your neighbors. Most people don't want to look out their window and see someone urinating. So if you choose to live in a city, then that is a behavior that should be avoided. Your "right" to urinate outside ends when it starts effecting the right of others. The goes for not mowing your yard and growing a garden in your front yard. Your right to do those things ends when it starts effecting my property values. You chose to live in a subdivision, so you need to show respect for your neighbor. Now none of these apply if you live out in the country. Your unmowed lawn and front yard garden is not going to effect others. So enjoy.

What two (or more) adult want to do in a bedroom is none of my business. I don't really care or want to know. However, that ends the moment that someone want the government to force another person or company to act in a specific way in regard to those activities or to grant tax benefits with regards to those activities. Once either of those occur, all taxpayers have the right to express their views. If you want freedom in the bedroom, keep the bedroom activities in the bedroom.

An other item the typically comes up in these type of discussion is smoking tobacco. Now, I don't care if you smoke. Smoke until you turn blue due to CO poisoning. I don't care. But when you do that in public you take away my right to health. I and the other 10 non-smokers that you are harming have the right to protect our right to health by forcing you to not smoke. This isn't the "government" taking away your right to smoke, it is other protecting their right to health.
__________________
HouseViewOnline: Real estate for Cape Girardeau, Jackson, Festus and St. Louis.
 
Reply With Quote
Go Back   Webmaster Forum > The Webmaster Forums > Forum Lobby > Controversial Social Issues

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How do you overthrow a Government? socks Controversial Social Issues 14 03-16-2010 11:54 AM
The Government Has YOUR Baby's DNA! Allen Farlow Controversial Social Issues 32 02-18-2010 05:13 PM
Can a government tell you what to wear? juliensimon Controversial Social Issues 102 07-22-2009 03:19 PM
We're the Government -- and You're Not Ferre Controversial Social Issues 3 07-30-2007 08:16 AM


V7N Network
Get exposure! V7N I Love Photography V7N SEO Blog V7N Directory


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:36 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000-2014 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Copyright © 2003 - 2014 Escalate Media




Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.