Webmaster Forum

Go Back   Webmaster Forum > The Webmaster Forums > Forum Lobby > Controversial Social Issues

Controversial Social Issues Discussions concerning controversial social issues. Topics include politics, religion, culture, social and economic issues, etc. Respect required at all times.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Share |
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2012, 01:47 PM
Contributing Member
Latest Blog:
None

 
Join Date: 08-15-06
Posts: 10,109
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Mortgage Relief Tax Exemption Set To Expire, Threatening Struggling Homeowners

Quote:
Beginning on Jan. 1, people who lose their home to foreclosure will be required to pay federal taxes on any unpaid mortgage the bank can't recoup through an auction. The same will be true for homeowners whose loan principal is reduced by a mortgage modification, with the wiped-out loan being treated as taxable income.

The new tax obligation will hit because the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act expires at the end of the year. The 2007 law was passed to save struggling homeowners from getting whacked twice, first by the sagging housing market and second by the Internal Revenue Service. Its expiration could push more people to remain in homes worth less than their mortgages, slowing the housing market's recovery.

"The housing market is in its first stages of recovery, making now the worst time to take this exemption away from homeowners," Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) told HuffPost. McDermott has introduced one of the bills geared toward extending the exemption.

"This exemption allows homeowners to write down their mortgages and refinance without incurring a hefty tax bill," he added. "This ultimately lowers monthly mortgage payments, leaving more money in the hands of homeowners at a time when they need it most. If Congress does not act, the gains the housing market has made will be wiped away."

The Washington Post reported on Friday that a number of former White House economic advisers and other economists consider the sagging housing market to be one of the greatest obstacles to recovery. Yet Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and others in the administration think there is little more they can do to help struggling homeowners, according to the Post.

Extending the tax exemption would help. The exemption, which can be as much as $2 million per household, covers individuals who negotiate a principal reduction on their existing mortgage, sell their house short (i.e., for less than the outstanding loans), or participate in a foreclosure process.

Under normal circumstances, homeowners who sold their house for less than the balance of the mortgage -- and were forgiven the difference by the bank -- would have to pay income tax on that windfall. Negotiating a reduction in the mortgage principal would also generate tax liability.

For example, an individual who owed a $400,000 mortgage might decide to sell the house, now worth $300,000 on the local market. If he sold the property short and the bank forgave the extra $100,000 -- an arrangement that benefits the lender because it recoups more of the original loan than would a foreclosure -- the IRS would consider that amount as income, on which the borrower could owe thousands of dollars in taxes.

"This has the effect of pulling people up with one hand, and hitting them in the face and knocking them over the cliff with the other," Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) told reporter David Dayen back in August.

An extension of the tax exemption would appear to be a common-sense means to help stabilize the housing market, but the political turmoil around the fiscal-cliff negotiations means common sense may not win out.

"The challenge is that a single-issue tax provision of this type -- of any type, frankly -- just simply doesn't move on its own," said Linda Goold, tax counsel for the National Association of Realtors. "It will be part of a package or it will not move. ... It is really tied to the future of what happens with the big deal and then whatever they come up with after that relating to the provisions that either have or will be expiring."

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) believes that the mortgage relief provision will be on the table during the grand-bargain talks, according to communications director Nadeam Elshami.

"Extension of this tax provision has passed by a bipartisan vote in the Senate Finance Committee, and we anticipate that it will be part of Congress' year-end negotiations," Elshami said. "Democrats hope to work with the House Republican leadership to support bipartisan measures which benefit the middle-class homeowners."

A senior House Republican aide said the provision would likely be dealt with as part of negotiations around a variety of tax exemptions set to expire at year's end. Those negotiations, he said, wouldn't begin in earnest as long as the fiscal-cliff talks were under way.

A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said that Republicans declined to move the extension bill forward in the Senate Finance Committee. "Senator Reid tried to move the bill before we left, but was unable to get the Republicans to agree, even though it received strong bipartisan support from the committee," said Adam Jentleson.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/1...n_2176013.html

The most absurd is to let expire the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act, anyone voting against it is not for the people!

It is exatly the same principal when some people want to tax the people who don't have money.

What are your thoughts on this?
__________________
"The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant."

Robespierre
 
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2012, 01:51 PM
ScriptMan's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: 02-10-07
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 12,122
iTrader: 4 / 100%
I think it is what the people want. They voted for it. Elections have consequences and this is one of those.
__________________
SEO does not mean Spam Everywhere Online
Scriptman's Playhouse || Ramblings from an old man
 
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2012, 06:43 PM
Contributing Member
Latest Blog:
None

 
Join Date: 08-15-06
Posts: 10,109
iTrader: 11 / 100%
I don't know, but in my opinion taxing on wealth that do not exist anymore is completly absurd.
__________________
"The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant."

Robespierre
 
Reply With Quote
Go Back   Webmaster Forum > The Webmaster Forums > Forum Lobby > Controversial Social Issues

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Freddie Mac Betting Against Struggling Homeowners Franc Tireur Controversial Social Issues 0 01-31-2012 11:10 AM
Fed wants to strip a key protection for homeowners Franc Tireur Controversial Social Issues 4 12-02-2010 03:28 PM
Saving homeowners - 1 at a time Franc Tireur Controversial Social Issues 9 09-09-2009 07:00 AM
Google threatening de-indexing Mia Google Forum 27 05-06-2006 01:31 PM


V7N Network
Get exposure! V7N I Love Photography V7N SEO Blog V7N Directory


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:47 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000-2014 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Copyright © 2003 - 2014 Escalate Media




Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.