v7ndotcomelursrebmem.tld is not an exact match. As far as Google is concerned, it might as well be chinesecheckers.com
That is, the words are not seperated by a hyphen so the keywords are not visible to Google.
Cheers
Greg Boser posts a response, too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Boser
Please.
Google has been identifing exact matches in domains without hyphens for close to two years now.
(Notice how the words in the domain are bolded even without a hyphen?)
Now, Google does highlight the keywords in the URLs in the SERPs. But to be more accurate, Google highlights exact match of the occurences of search term in the SERPs.
Most folks know that the highlighting is not an indication of any algorithmic ranking of the keywords, which would require Google to have almost psychic abilities.
And I should state, Google does not have those psychic abilities yet.
For example, in this search Google highlights rapist in the word "therapist". Does Google know something we don't? Are all therapists rapists?
There are a ton of searches like this were Google highlights words that were created simply by running two words together.
I'll be posting screencaps later. For now, check out some funny dual meaning domains here:
The highlighting is a simple search of word in the stream of text.
so if you searched for 'aaa' it will highlight it not mater in which combination it's present like "bbaaaabbb" or "bb.aaa-aaa.bb" ....
So it has nothing to do with search. Just as would human go through page and highlight all occurrences of "aaa" on that page.
------------------------------------------
To disprove the theory that google can search for incomplete words simply do the search for "memorandu" all pages you find will have "memorandu" as a separate word. And no pages with "memorandum". That pretty much proves that google can not do search for partial words. So basically in case of domain name v7ndotcomelursrebmem.tld it can not say that this page is relevant for search "v7ndotcom elursrebmem" because it has "v7ndotcom" and "elursrebmem" in it.
It will be relevant only to "v7ndotcomelursrebmem" word.
PS: Forgot to add: So John i am totally agree with you here. And that guy "Andy Hagans" knows nothing
That one, WashingtonFreePress, shows up without "washing" on the page copy. Anchor text? OR is it parsing the "washing"? I'm betting on anchor text for the moment.
Again with the oddball highlighting. But you'll notice it doesn't highlight "Washing" in this URL:
That one, WashingtonFreePress, shows up without "washing" on the page copy. Anchor text? OR is it parsing the "washing"? I'm betting on anchor text for the moment.
For that search phrase there are a bunch of words "Washington" (in the result) that has not been highlighted. But at the same time the "wash" has been highlighted in the "Elephant Car Wash"
