Google Removes Social Circle Data

[snakeair]

Check out this news.

Google Search Plus Your World is all about social data. Many things Google does in social is aimed at getting information from you so they can build up your profile and return you search results and other related information which is personalised for you, based on your social graph.

To do that Google needs to know your social graph. It needs to know how you connect to entities and to other people. In some of my presentations I showed some of what Google knew of you because Google gave that information away, for free. Now it seems to have pulled the social circle data. There is no announcement and you can still find the search result, but the...

Continued at: http://www.stateofsearch.com/google-social-circle-data/

Any thoughts on this?

[martianflyboy]

I am curious to find out just how much Google knows about me.

[plumbers101]

Because Google Plus is now having lot of users that's why they tend to remove circles.

[snakeair]

Originally Posted by plumbers101

Because Google Plus is now having lot of users that's why they tend to remove circles.

What circles are you talking about? You read the blog post?

[sitetutor]

As usual, Google pushes the envelope as far as it gets them results and when it comes time to bail, they change back to deleting the initial campaign once they have received enough data to create a lucrative strategy.

[bjohnson]

I've made an account on Google+ but not using it so much. But now i think it is gaining so much popularity, so i must give it try. This is new news for me.

[wade32]

Originally Posted by snakeair

What circles are you talking about? You read the blog post?

Not really, if you want us to read something, then why don't you post it in the forum? Just asking...

[snakeair]

Originally Posted by wade32

Not really, if you want us to read something, then why don't you post it in the forum? Just asking...

I did, I created this thread and looking for feedback on the topic at hand. plumbers101 has a habit of not reading replies before posting.

[robjones]

Originally Posted by wade32

Not really, if you want us to read something, then why don't you post it in the forum? Just asking...

Copyright law comes to mind, but either way its laid out in our Quality Posting Guidelines that we do not post entire articles, whether with or without attribution. http://www.v7n.com/forums/getting-st...uidelines.html

Starting Quality Threads

When starting threads, please do NOT post entire articles, even if credit is given.

If you would like to start a discussion concerning an article you have found (not one you have written) the best way is to first introduce the topic itself, then add a quote from the article (along with a link) that basically sums up the discussion. Then ask some specific questions that encourage members to respond with their thoughts.

Don't forget to ask the members to read the referenced article before responding.

[HTMLBasicTutor]

Originally Posted by wade32

Not really, if you want us to read something, then why don't you post it in the forum? Just asking...

Because... that would be an infringement on the original author's copyright.

[ronnyroll]

What updates you are looking for, Google’s blog has it when it is there. Social media content circulation is very important while ranking. There is no further changes in its stand, as per internet records.