Blog Comment Or Forum Signature - Which is better for building backlinks? - Page 2

Bestone · 08-21-2009, 06:33 AM

Blog commenting and forum posting are equally important.Both required lots of efforts to get backlinks

karmadir · 08-31-2009, 03:07 AM

Forum Posting is much than blog commenting. Forum Posting gives faster results.

dWhite · 08-12-2009, 07:37 AM

Blog comments definitely hold more value than forum signature links, due to the fact that you can't get thousands of them from the same blog like you can on a forum.

ashokkumar · 08-28-2009, 05:06 AM

Both Forum and blog comment posting is good.
Before that analysing related niche is better.

stupid camel · 08-13-2009, 12:33 AM

doing both is certainly much better than just posting on forums or just commenting on blogs.
you just need to work much much harder.

WebTrafficSeller · 08-20-2009, 07:05 AM

This tool: siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com is supposed to be very good for finding backlinks.

On the other hand, i couldnt find any backlinks from my v7n-signature to my own site.

improveeyesighyt · 08-20-2009, 01:57 PM

Try to comment on high Blog sites to increase your page rank, and in the forums to get targeted traffic.

sitebee · 08-20-2009, 03:12 PM

I think both are important.

joeldavis · 08-20-2009, 03:40 PM

Dan Theis, StomperNet faculty SEO guru guy, says irrelevancy does not penalize. If it did, your competitor could buy thousands of links from bad neighborhood/irrelevant sites and point it to your site and knock you down in the SERPs. Supposedly, they compensate for relevant links, but do not penalize for irrelevant.

Euk_jason · 08-20-2009, 07:29 PM

Both are good for your domain name but Forums Signature are bit more important then Blog comments since they are fast result generators then blog comments

jamalin78 · 08-21-2009, 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeldavis

Dan Theis, StomperNet faculty SEO guru guy, says irrelevancy does not penalize. If it did, your competitor could buy thousands of links from bad neighborhood/irrelevant sites and point it to your site and knock you down in the SERPs. Supposedly, they compensate for relevant links, but do not penalize for irrelevant.

That makes perfect sense to me, yeah.

There is no understimating the lengths people would go to when trying to achieve higher rankings!

WebTrafficSeller · 08-28-2009, 03:44 AM

Here's another advantage of forum signatures:

When you change your signature on most forums, it changes all occurrances. Let's say you've made 400 posts, and you put up a new website. To get 400 inbound links, just change the URL in your signature. Of course, you will lose those links to your old URL, but that might be worthwhile.

cool_fp · 08-28-2009, 04:21 AM

I think both are good but I prefer to use forum

intro · 08-28-2009, 04:24 AM

It depends on what you want, if you want to improve on google search list, then post links, if you want PR better, then forums

I'm doing both, as I'm SEO of Elebo comp. (working for others too).

lathrop · 08-29-2009, 10:38 AM

Both are Good alternatives but I prefer Forum Sigs to blog commenting in terms of quality.

Adnan Khan · 08-29-2009, 01:44 PM

It doesn't matter if the comment is from the forum or the blog. What matter's is its property. If they're do-follow then each and every link is important.

arnoldsmithh · 08-30-2009, 11:44 PM

Both are best and it depend which thing you can do best. Whether forums or blog comments

WebTrafficSeller · 09-02-2009, 01:29 AM

It seems to me that blog commenting should be considered a bit different than forum signatures. Quick, relatively thoughtless comments on blogs may bring your blog instant traffic and links, the long-term benefits of leaving thoughtful comments and building relationships with bloggers is far more valuable.

Link dropping may bring you some traffic but the people who read your thoughtless and spammy blog comments aren’t going to respect you.