Well John, I do believe you have the capability to sift the crap from the truth and me too I don't believe everything I read but one thing I am 100% sure of and that is that there is enough circomstancial evidence to justify an investigation into the many credible questions that have come up since 9/11.
Untill that has been done the whole world will keep thinking the same, that something stinks like hell.
The fact that those buildings are pulled down using demolition charges is proven btw. p-r-o-v-e-n! So it is also p-r-o-v-e-n that the US government has been officially lying. As is p-r-o-v-e-n also the US government has been lying more often in relation with 9/11, in fact there have been more lies than truth comming out of their mouths in relation with 9/11.
So this we know 100% sure: The US Government is lying about aspects of 9/11.
This flight was reported by the federal government to be a Boeing 757 aircraft, registration number N591UA, carrying 45 persons, including four Arab hijackers who had taken control of the aircraft, crashing the plane in a Pennsylvania farm field.
Aerial photos of the alleged crash site were made available to the general public. They show a significant hole in the ground, but private investigators were not allowed to come anywhere near the crash site. If an aircraft crash caused the hole in the ground, there would have literally hundreds of serially-controlled time-change parts within the hole that would have proved beyond any shadow of doubt the precise tail-number or identity of the aircraft. However, the government has not produced any hard evidence that would prove beyond a doubt that the specifically alleged aircraft crashed at that site. On the contrary, it has been reported that the aircraft, registry number N591UA, is still in operation.
Quote:
Conclusion
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. The hard evidence would have included hundreds of critical time-change aircraft items, plus security videotapes that were confiscated by the FBI immediately following each tragic episode.
With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. Regarding the planes that allegedly flew into the WTC towers, it is only just possible that heavy aircraft were involved in each incident, but no evidence has been produced that would add credence to the government's theoretical version of what actually caused the total destruction of the buildings, let alone proving the identity of the aircraft. That is the problem with the government's 911 story. It is time to apply the precautionary principle.
As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history.
The thing about freefall is right, so could there have been explosives near the ground as well?
Yes, in fact there had to be. That is an important factor in how total demolition at near-freefall speed is accomplished. A bottom floor or two must be taken out to allow the full force of gravity to do it's work with the above successively exploding structure. The first few floors must be the first or very close to it to go, otherwise the upper falling structure's momentum will be impeded.
Most people do not have a profound understanding of the laws of physics. If they did, then they would easily realize that it is impossible for a 110 story steel building to completely collapse into it's own foot print and become a few story high pile of rubble in 9.8 seconds, without the occurrence of a natural disaster such as an earthquake, or the use of properly orchestrated explosions.
Criminal evidence in Edmonds’ explosive case is apparently getting too close to Washington officials, since the former contract linguist also told us she would not deny that "once this issue gets to be...investigated, you will be seeing certain [American] people that we know from this country standing trial; and they will be prosecuted criminally," revealing the content of the FBI intercepts she heard indicates that recognizable, very high-profile American citizens are linked to the 911 attacks.
