What Destroyed The World Trade Centers?

[John Scott]

I do not lie to people. All I do is show live footage of the event, NOT recorded by me, NOT commented by me.

What purpose does it serve, when it is obviously false? You can find liar everywhere. If you look hard enough I'm sure you can find somebody who will tell you he saw Bush fly an F-16 made out of Vaseline into the twin towers. What purpose does it serve to parrot that trash?

[Ferre]

Originally Posted by John Scott

What purpose does it serve, when it is obviously false? You can find liar everywhere. If you look hard enough I'm sure you can find somebody who will tell you he saw Bush fly an F-16 made out of Vaseline into the twin towers. What purpose does it serve to parrot that trash?

Dude, the footage is not false, Me too doubt whether it was a military plane, but that woman, and the voice of the person with her, mention a military plane. This can only be explained by those who actually where in that room viewing it, they can be wrong, but they have mentioned a military plane the second they saw it crashing.


What it serves to 'parrot that trash'? It serves as historical footage, it serves as sn example of the fact that many people have seen different things than what we-are-told.


Let's go back to those explosions. Numerous eye witnesses, and even news anchors have mentioned explosions at the moment it all happened. two days later, no news was mentioning anything about explosions anymore, every single footage of the live videos had the original talk about hearing explosives cut out, fire department people were not allowed to testify about those explosions (seriously) and they were left out the official reports. That worse thing is that there has not even been any kind of investigation if those explosions happened or not.

[John Scott]

the footage is not false

Who said that it wasn't false?

but that woman, and the voice of the person with her, mention a military plane.

Millions of people saw that jetliner crash into the buildings. Thousands on the ground, and millions more on live TV and in replays. The likelihood of an intelligent human being uttering those moronic words is... nonexistent, by definition.

[John Scott]

Why did they say they chose to release the video through revver?

Revver was made for you. Every time someone watches a video that you've uploaded or shared, you could earn money.

[adamk1]

It has to be the fact that two aeroplanes hitting the buildings, I mean people test structures to ensure they are secure and safe but you dont test what would happen if.. I mean how can someone test something like that its like saying what would happen if an asteroid hit a massive building

[thegamerslink]

Originally Posted by adamk1

It has to be the fact that two aeroplanes hitting the buildings, I mean people test structures to ensure they are secure and safe but you dont test what would happen if.. I mean how can someone test something like that its like saying what would happen if an asteroid hit a massive building

The argument that the towers were brought down intentionally by the U.S. government is so far beyond ridiculous to even justify with an alternate argument so why even bother?

[Harveyj]

Everyone knows that the Twin Towers were taken out by Hulk Hogan
Here's the video to prove it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BFxLLsqV6k

[lovelylovely]

"strategically placed demolition charges "

from all the theories i have heard an internal job looks the most likely thing

[thegamerslink]

Read the engineering reports, fire brought them down, use a little common sense. Make fire, take out the fire suppression systems of a high rise building such as the WTC building and see what eventually happens.

[lovelylovely]

and who made the report ?? us engineers??

[thegamerslink]

Forget the reports and use common sense then. Is that to difficult or do some just not have any?

[John Scott]

Originally Posted by thegamerslink

Forget the reports and use common sense then. Is that to difficult or do some just not have any?

Dude, don't waste your time. The poster obviously hasn't done his or her homework if they think that it was an internal job.

[thegamerslink]

Good point

[Rick2]

Originally Posted by thegamerslink

The argument that the towers were brought down intentionally by the U.S. government is so far beyond ridiculous to even justify with an alternate argument so why even bother?

The argument that the 9/11 commission report is any where in the same realm as reality is so far beyond ridiculous only someone with about 3 brain cells could believe it.

[John Scott]

Originally Posted by Rick2

The argument that the 9/11 commission report is any where in the same realm as reality is so far beyond ridiculous only someone with about 3 brain cells could believe it.

Please back up your statements with reasoning. Thanks.

[Bob Barr]

I don't know if this has been previously been noted but, sorry, I'm not going to read through 900+ responses to find out.


This dishonest poll stinks to high heavens. Its dishonesty is accomplished through the all-too-common technique of 'splitting the oposition'.

There are three plausible (but undesired) answers provided, all of which overlap.

2) airplanes crashing into the towers

3) the subsequent fires and

4) a combination of those two

The choices made by reasonable people who differ a bit on the exact cause get split three ways. Yes, the planes started the fires but would the airplanes alone have caused the collapse? Maybe, maybe not.

Quibbling over the details will generally result in a fairly even split. Some people will pick crash as it is the immediate cause. Others will pick the resulting fires. Meanwhile, some will decide that it took a combination of those two factors.

This split leaves a plurality of responses in the desired 'demolition charges' category. This is exactly as it was intended to happen.

[zelphics]

Originally Posted by thegamerslink

Read the engineering reports, fire brought them down, use a little common sense. Make fire, take out the fire suppression systems of a high rise building such as the WTC building and see what eventually happens.

I'm not going to argue with anyone, but it is very odd that that day was the only time in history that a steel building was brought down by a fire.

Maybe you remember the b25 bomber smashing into the empire state building? Is that building still standing? Yes.

I am in no way endorsing that this was part of a government plot (I don't think its possible to cover up something this big, like the moon landings), I just sometimes question if we know the entire story.

[Rick2]

Originally Posted by John Scott

Please back up your statements with reasoning. Thanks.

Sorry, but the post I responded to had no reasoning.