Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zap
This one was just too good to pass on.
You DO realize that the US violated the will of the UN to invade Iraq? Right?
|
The will of the UN is not a UN resolution nor is it a law.
I can't believe you just said what you did. We did not break any laws invading Iraq. How about we talk about the Goal of the UN instead? Maybe they should be more concerned about that?
Also you do remember the oil for food scandal, right? Guess that might explain the "will" they had for us not to go in
That was too good to pass up as well
Quote:
You can't violate the will of the UN (and, indeed, the will of the nations of Earth) one day and then stand up as the defender of the UN the next day.
It doesn't work that way.
|
Yes you can. When you have
actual resolutions stating do not do something and they continue to do it for 11 years, and then the very people that say you can not do that
refuse to do anything about it someone has to do something. If the UN doesn't want to hold countries accountable for their actions then imo the US should withdraw from the UN and take care of shit ourselves. Of course that would only lead to people like you crying like little girls over the fact that we got fed up with the UN and it's like of "balls". Do not do this or else... we will hand you another resolution saying "do not do this or else"! It's LAUGHABLE.
So we can critize the UN and at the sametime hold up the resolutions they pass being that we are on the security council.
You do realize that we did not have approval for ousting the leader of Yugoslavia correct? No one bitched then.
Quote:
That last sentence was incomplete. It should have read...
"Instead you have Canada, Germany, France, Russia and China letting us take the heat for the problems we encounter during the invasion we undertook after we ignored and violated the will of those countries."
|
Oil For Food scandal. Their will was to keep dealing with Sadaam. Our will was to remove him after his repeated defiance.
Again, I feel bad for you. You seem like the type that just want to sit back and let people walk all over you. When you see something wrong and the majority are either dealing with the enemy or just don't care enough to do anything about it you would rather just not take the heat that would come with standing up for what is right, which is stopping hostile countries from gaining more power than they should, and lay back and let them do whatever they want.
You have shown this with Iran. Some countries object to pressure on Iran. You then do not wish the US to pressure them because people might not like us. Boo Hoo, too bad.
Quote:
|
So, what punishment would you give to Mr. Bush and Mr. Blair for defying the UN back in March of 2003?
|
Nothing. He broke no resolution saying we could not invande because there was none. Just like Clinton went into Kosovo without written consent from the almighty UN in the 90's.
Again, I can't believe you just tried to make an arguement over doing something against the will of the UN when the very country we attacked actually broke more UN Resolutions than I can count yet what did you want to do with him? Spank him on his hand?
