|
View Poll Results: Are you with Abortion or against?
|
|
I am totaly with Abortion
|
 
|
15 |
24.19% |
|
I am against it for any reason
|
 
|
30 |
48.39% |
|
It depends on the cituation
|
 
|
17 |
27.42% |
 |
|
11-08-2006, 10:46 PM
|
#81 (permalink)
|
|
Individualist
Join Date: 09-27-03
Location: Japan, mostly
Posts: 42,521
|
Quote:
|
I don't believe a human is formed in the first trimester
|
So you want to throw out the definition of "human" which states that a human is a living organism belonging to the species Homo sapiens, and institute a new definition for human that has to do with appearance?
Is that correct?
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 10:47 PM
|
#82 (permalink)
|
|
v7n Mentor
Join Date: 08-23-06
Posts: 2,118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by joecacia
Why Avi you choose it depend? On what situation you agree with abortion, you just said on your first time you are against?
|
Please don't take it to your heart! If we make abortion 100% illegal, too many women will die in serious medical cases.
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 10:47 PM
|
#83 (permalink)
|
|
Individualist
Join Date: 09-27-03
Location: Japan, mostly
Posts: 42,521
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Will
A fetus is not legal deemed a human until a certain number of weeks into the pregnancy.
|
Not true at all. Law has never questioned the species of the embyro.
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 10:49 PM
|
#84 (permalink)
|
|
Lebanese Princess
Join Date: 05-09-06
Location: USA, CT
Posts: 3,986
Latest Blog: None
|
I don't get it, if you make it illegal they will die for medical cases why?
OK, when people have a medical condition this is something not using in here, it is about killing another human being, I am not against your choice, just why you did choose it. 
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 10:50 PM
|
#85 (permalink)
|
|
JohnScott's Lovechild
Join Date: 10-12-03
Posts: 9,994
Latest Blog: None
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Scott
So you want to throw out the definition of "human" which states that a human is a living organism belonging to the species Homo sapiens, and institute a new definition for human that has to do with appearance?
Is that correct?
|
Again, I'll reread and try to find where I stated that appearance makes me for abortion. One sec. 
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 10:52 PM
|
#86 (permalink)
|
|
v7n Mentor
Join Date: 08-23-06
Posts: 2,118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by joecacia
I don't get it, if you make it illegal they will die for medical cases why?
OK, when people have a medical condition this is something not using in here, it is about killing another human being, I am not against your choice, just why you did choose it. 
|
I've explained my reason to choose the last option. I was against abortion even in the another thread (political section) and doing the same thing in this thread.
I'm not gonna agree on this point if you think that we should save a fetus by killing a grown up human (woman, in this case).
I've heard about many situations when abortion is necessary. So, I'm just trying to be fair with the abortion stuff.
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 10:56 PM
|
#87 (permalink)
|
|
Individualist
Join Date: 09-27-03
Location: Japan, mostly
Posts: 42,521
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian
Again, I'll reread and try to find where I stated that appearance makes me for abortion. One sec. 
|
Or forget the rereading, and tell me how your non-DNA, non-scientific definition of humanity is better than a scientific one. 
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 10:59 PM
|
#88 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: 10-14-06
Location: Australia , Townsfillly.
Posts: 840
Latest Blog: None
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Scott
Not true at all. Law has never questioned the species of the embyro.
|
trust me for once John.
or do some research
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 11:00 PM
|
#89 (permalink)
|
|
JohnScott's Lovechild
Join Date: 10-12-03
Posts: 9,994
Latest Blog: None
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Scott
Or forget the rereading, and tell me how your non-DNA, non-scientific definition of humanity is better than a scientific one. 
|
Viability in the foundation for my conclusions.  Wikipedia offers a nice definition, but in short it means the capacity for survival.
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 11:00 PM
|
#90 (permalink)
|
|
Individualist
Join Date: 09-27-03
Location: Japan, mostly
Posts: 42,521
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillL
trust me for once John.
or do some research
|
Will, if you think Courts have determined that a human fetus is not human, simply post the species that the organism known as "human fetus" belongs to.
The species. Please.
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 11:02 PM
|
#91 (permalink)
|
|
Individualist
Join Date: 09-27-03
Location: Japan, mostly
Posts: 42,521
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian
Viability in the foundation for my conclusions.  Wikipedia offers a nice definition, but in shrot it means the capacity for survival.
|
So, again, why do you think that human that is viable outside of the womb should have rights that a human that is not viable outside of the womb should have?
That's what I'm asking. 
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 11:05 PM
|
#92 (permalink)
|
|
JohnScott's Lovechild
Join Date: 10-12-03
Posts: 9,994
Latest Blog: None
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Scott
So, again, why do you think that human that is viable outside of the womb should have rights that a human that is not viable outside of the womb should have?
That's what I'm asking. 
|
If something can't survive I don't consider it living.
That's what I'm saying. 
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 11:06 PM
|
#93 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: 10-14-06
Location: Australia , Townsfillly.
Posts: 840
Latest Blog: None
|
Look. A fetus is not considered human until x weeks.
simple
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 11:07 PM
|
#94 (permalink)
|
|
Individualist
Join Date: 09-27-03
Location: Japan, mostly
Posts: 42,521
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian
If something can't survive I don't consider it living.
That's what I'm saying. 
|
That is kind of a contradiction in terms.
The viability concept admits that the fetus is alive, but says that the fetus cannot live outside of the womb. So "viability" as a concept demands and requires that its subject be living.
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 11:08 PM
|
#95 (permalink)
|
|
JohnScott's Lovechild
Join Date: 10-12-03
Posts: 9,994
Latest Blog: None
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Scott
That is kind of a contradiction in terms.
The viability concept admits that the fetus is alive, but says that the fetus cannot live outside of the womb. So "viability" as a concept demands and requires that its subject be living.
|
Living off of something else, yep.
Living on its own, nope.
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 11:08 PM
|
#96 (permalink)
|
|
Individualist
Join Date: 09-27-03
Location: Japan, mostly
Posts: 42,521
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillL
Look. A fetus is not considered human until x weeks.
simple
|
Answer the question:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by John Scott
Will, if you think Courts have determined that a human fetus is not human, simply post the species that the organism known as "human fetus" belongs to.
The species. Please.
|
Answer.
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 11:09 PM
|
#97 (permalink)
|
|
Individualist
Join Date: 09-27-03
Location: Japan, mostly
Posts: 42,521
| |