America's Attack on Men & the Nuclear Family

[kristeejo]

Originally Posted by ewomack

Since we've delved into the realm of the theological I must ask: Can God create a gender that He/She can't screw? I would think God, with the omniscient power to screw, could screw anything, so the question of gender remains unresolved... If God can create males that He can screw, then He's female. Conversely, if He can create females He can screw, then She's Male. But if God is Male can He create Males She can screw? If not, is She male? If so, is He female? Oooh... oooooh...

I'M GONNA BE UP ALL NIGHT!!!!

Atom?

[Atom]

What.

[Atom]

I read that.


That's the best I could do.

[Atom]

lol

[Atom]

Did you read the rules?
Yes.
Ok.

lol

[Izzmo]

Jeez Atom.. lol

Anyways...

[G10]

Originally Posted by kristeejo

Gio - you only have to worry about this topic if you're heterosexual hun.

I love you too babe

[Atom]

Lotsa eyeballs.


Ok where were we ...

Oh right .. yes I think a nuclear attack is in order.

[Cricket]

I am not ignoring this topic. I just simply decided it was way too dangerous to respond to in a public forum.

[Atom]

I'm sure you've all seen my man of the future, so, I won't post him again. lol

Yeah, somethin' ain't right. I am noticing more effeminate looking boys and men. What the heck is going on? They put steroids in the drinking water or somethin'?

[Atom]

I don't care what ya say though, Rick Ocasek and the Cars are genius!

[John Scott]

Originally Posted by kristeejo

LOL - I've spent ALOT of time in family court over the past ten years. I don't disagree that in many cases, mom does get the kids...but IMO it has little to do with the court system and more to do with dads not wanting to step up to the plate.

Or women trying to convince courts that men don't want to step up to the plate.

[John Scott]

http://www.mediaradar.org/docs/VAWA-...ing-Orders.pdf

Read that. The fact that some woman in NM could successfully get a restaining order against a man she never met, David Letterman, just highlights the absurdity of the situation.

According to several attorneys in WA that I spoke to, it's standard operating procudure in a divorce for the woman to get a order of protection against the husband in order to increase her chances for full custody and higher child support payments.

[kristeejo]

Originally Posted by John Scott

http://www.mediaradar.org/docs/VAWA-...ing-Orders.pdf

Read that. The fact that some woman in NM could successfully get a restaining order against a man she never met, David Letterman, just highlights the absurdity of the situation.

According to several attorneys in WA that I spoke to, it's standard operating procudure in a divorce for the woman to get a order of protection against the husband in order to increase her chances for full custody and higher child support payments.

My ex broke down my front door and it was still not an easy task for me to obtain a restraining order. Even when I did, it was only ordered for a short amount of time.

None of what you are saying is what happened to me in any way shape or form. I've spent many many days inside the courthouse waiting for hours for a court hearing to begin....and watched other cases just like mine happening as well.

[John Scott]

Christy, did you have an attorney?

[kristeejo]

of course....but not for the restraining order.

I was extremely naive about the system initially.

[onlinedude]

Well, not having an attorney explains why you may have had trouble.

Also, there's another factor that John doesn't mention and that is to a large extent, the family court system rewards pathological behaviour.

Christy, I'm guessing you tried to be decent and honest about it all, and your ex didn't. That would make it somewhat of an uphill battle for you.

I think that's part of what the Letterman incident shows too. A person can just lie in court and get results because of that.