WOMD - Issue or Non-issue

[John Scott]

I was thinking today, and trying to recall if I had ever talked to a single person whose stance on Iraq had changed since it was revealed that there were no weapons of mass destruction.

I thought long an hard, and I can't recall one (either for or against) whose stance had changed. The people who were for the invasion continued to be for it, regardless of weapons of mass destruction. The people who were against it continued to be against it, regardless.

So I was wondering, is all this hoopla about the non-existent WOMD just hype manufactured by the anti-war freaks?

So I came up with some questions, to clarify whether or not the WOMD is a real issue or a non-issue.

Keep track of your "yes" and "no" answers, post the total when you've answered all the questions.

1. If North Korea were to develop weapons of mass destuction, I would support an invasion.

Yes
No

2. If Libya were to develop weapons of mass destruction, I would support an invasion.

Yes
No

3. If Cuba were to develop WOMD I would support an invasion.

Yes
No

4. The United Kingdom has nuclear weapons and I support an invasion.

Yes
No

5. France has nuclear weapons and other faults and I support an invasion.

Yes
No

6. I believe that foreign powers should have left the Jewish people, homosexuals and disabled people to fend for themselves against the Third Reich.

Yes
No

7. The 500,000 to 1,000,000 Tutsis and Hutu sympathizers who were murdered in the Rwandan Genocide have themselves to blame for their murder. It is not for other nations to meddle in internal genocides.

Yes
No

8. If I witness a person being assaulted I will go along my merry way and not meddle in the affairs of others.

Yes
No

[The American Voters]

Originally Posted by John Scott

I was thinking today, and trying to recall if I had ever talked to a single person whose stance on Iraq had changed since it was revealed that there were no weapons of mass destruction.

I thought long an hard, and I can't recall one (either for or against) whose stance had changed. The people who were for the invasion continued to be for it, regardless of weapons of mass destruction. The people who were against it continued to be against it, regardless.

So I was wondering, is all this hoopla about the non-existent WOMD just hype manufactured by the anti-war freaks?

So I came up with some questions, to clarify whether or not the WOMD is a real issue or a non-issue.

Keep track of your "yes" and "no" answers, post the total when you've answered all the questions.

1. If North Korea were to develop weapons of mass destuction, I would support an invasion.

Yes
No

2. If Libya were to develop weapons of mass destruction, I would support an invasion.

Yes
No

3. If Cuba were to develop WOMD I would support an invasion.

Yes
No

4. The United Kingdom has nuclear weapons and I support an invasion.

Yes
No

5. France has nuclear weapons and other faults and I support an invasion.

Yes
No

6. I believe that foreign powers should have left the Jewish people, homosexuals and disabled people to fend for themselves against the Third Reich.

Yes
No

7. The 500,000 to 1,000,000 Tutsis and Hutu sympathizers who were murdered in the Rwandan Genocide have themselves to blame for their murder. It is not for other nations to meddle in internal genocides.

Yes
No

8. If I witness a person being assaulted I will go along my merry way and not meddle in the affairs of others.

Yes
No

We knew Iraq had them because we had the receipts when we sold the WOMD's to them. J/K

1. I believe they already have them.

To answer 1 through 5 I think an invasion isn't necessary unless there is a clear and present danger that they will be used. We have nuclear weapons... should we be invaded? (dont give me that crap that we get rid of all of them)

6. I'm not familiar with this enough to answer.
7. Same as #6
8. I do what I can to help others out. If I feel I could assist someone being assaulted I will, otherwise I will find someone who can assist. Me getting in the middle and getting trampled isn't going to do any good to them.