Paid Links, Good or Bad?

[Cifra]

If you aren't well-known, I'd say you have nothing to worry about

[MrCat]

You should buy links only for advertising reasons - for added traffic and not solely for SEO and PR rpurposes.

[budin]

Originally Posted by cessai

it depends the links must have quality and related to your site. but if i were you, just try to get good free links

I agree with that since I have no big budget to buy links.. Well, it needs a lot of efforts though

[ishtar]

exactly.
i have been studying the math behind the pagerank system for months, and finally i know how to find good backlinks that can increase pr and ranking for 100%

[aira]

nothing wrong in purchasing links if the intention is to get more traffic for the benefit of the site visitors than tricking spiders to manipulate SERPs and PR but it's not the best way either.. IMO, we should focus on getting quality links the safest(directory submission), quality/related sites and natural way (link bait, decent content)

[redeemer_spawn]

you were right form that one aira., what important is that get a quality link which have a good/unique content., and it can really help your site., in which you have a relevant content with that site who've been linking.,

[2mymall]

Originally Posted by JusenMujarJr

Hope this can help you...http://www.webpronews.com/insiderrep...ks-good-or-bad

Basically what google is trying to say is if you want to pay for links, pay them. If not, work your arse of building your site's pr the proper way by exchanging links to relevant sites.

[scottdizzle]

I tend to agree with this:

a site of good quality will get quality links naturally.

But, who am I to judge someones page?