|
The engines got feed up with the spam laws in 2002 - 2003 , they started to impose strict penalities on spammers or sites they thought might spam. -
Why?
Spammers eat their bandwidth - Gmail, AOL, Hotmail, yahoo mail, etc.
Here's notes I wrote for staff meetings (I reported directly to the CEO):
12/2003 - affiliate advises he is not concerned with load times or search engine placement - will purchase placement.
12/03 - First site built to client exact design specifications - - site replaced per CEO/corporate
1/2004 - reported client (affiliate) to corporate for spamming - denies spamming
2/2004 reported client for again spamming - denies spamming again - meeting held with CEO
2/2004 client spamming again - denies spamming - client used photo linked to corporate site in spam - had to admit it ...lol
3/2004 client spammed again - AOL, excite, road runner temporarily ban north America site site due to spamming, corporate site also suffers lower placement - letter written to search engines about rouge employee. (IPs almost banned)
3/2004 spamming continues - reported to corporate - warned about service being discontinued
4/2004 - client advises he is moving site to different ISP, watch on him - per CEO.
That affiliate was told bye bye
Recently I left that company - they immediately linked to a questionable site (incoming and outgoing) They lost all standings in MSN and Yahoo - Google is dropping them like a rock now - My policy of no links what-so-ever was ignored..... (I would write sites linking to the lead collection site and demand they be removed.... The site had 2000 relivant keyword phrases in the top 10 , sooner then they think it will be just another online business card - get the point -
__________________
Just because you're paranoid doesn't necessarily mean people aren't out to get you
Last edited by pinkfluffybunny : 02-25-2008 at 07:44 AM.
|