In
an opinion posted on LinkingMatters.com -
Quote:
In WebProNews, Editor, Garrett French stirs up the debate between 'content seo' and 'link generation'.
He quotes from a post by John Scott who is of the opinion that "Content SEO is dead, and that anyone interested in raising their search engine rankings should focus only on link generation."
Our view is that it's a bit like asking a professional golfer which is more important, driving or putting? Some will be fabulous drivers, other fabulous putters but you need elements of both if you are to be successful.
The lessons I would take from our experiences at Linking Matters are:
You absolutely must have great content (and should never be afraid to link out to great content)
A linking strategy, targeted at top sites can produce tremendous results
Those results will be greatly enhanced through SEO
Keep adding content
|
I take one issue with this opinion:
Quote:
|
Our view is that it's a bit like asking a professional golfer which is more important, driving or putting?
|
They are comparing page-elements SEO to driving, and links to putting? Hello? McFly?
Page-elements SEO would be better compared to waving your putter around in the air and then beating yourself over the head with it.
Has this guy seen what page elements SEO does to pages?? Take a look at this "SEO'ed" page:
Content SEO
From a marketing point of view, page elements SEO is often like urinating on your customers.